Based on what was unveiled at Tesla’s Battery Day, Bill Russo of Automobility Limited is optimistic that the company will be able to integrate new battery technology within the three-year timeline, provided it has the development of the battery chemistries already proven.
Hydrogen: Many nations are moving their nation to utilizing Hydrogen for various reasons. See my Twitter page under the same name as this comment to see just some of what some nations are doing with Hydrogen. Hydrogen, it’s not just the future, it’s already here now.
@Boreasos Do my gravity test above and potentially have the literal Theory Of Everything. And if numbers do not exist in this universe as I said, or some way similar, then how exactly would numbers exist in this universe for math to do what math does in this universe?
Also, if you do not go with my current views of ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘gravity’, then please tell me and the rest of the world what ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘gravity’ truly are for starters.
@Charles Brightman
You mention gravity a few times in your hypotheses above, but you have to be more specific with what you mean as your ‘gravity test’.
As for numbers, they do not really ‘exist’ per se. Numbers are a human invention, an abstract representation of value and iteration, a tool that we use to more easily understand the mechanics of the universe. This can be easily verified, since any definition of numbers always regress to having to just list them. This self-explaining definition is an axiom that we rely on, but it doesn’t spring from the universe fully formed.
Your views of space, time and gravity are, in my view, just fancies of your mind.
Now, having a hypothesis is all well and good, but it has to conform to what is already known for it to be valid. Your musings contradict several know facts. Thinking that as a photon’s frequency changes, space changes? That makes no sense in relation to what we know.
Let me explain: You start well by postulating that wavelength equals speed divided by frequency, which is true. Then you say that wavelength is how far a photon goes in space, which is a bit of an incomplete statement. Wavelength is the distance a photon travels in the amount of time it takes for it to oscillate one full cycle. It has nothing to do with the ‘size of space itself’, whatever that means.
Wavelength changes if the energy of a photon changes, which can happen if it collides with another particle and some of it’s energy is lost. It will the continue traveling at the same velocity, but with a longer wavelength. This has nothing to do with the underlying fabric of spacetime, and space does not change as a result.
As for my understanding, I lean on the most current understanding of science. Spacetime is the four dimensional backdrop in which our universe exists. Gravity is the effect of matter and energy on spacetime. Or conversely, spacetime is a feature of the gravitational field that is borne from the matter and energy that creates it.
@Boreasos Gravity test: It’s posted above in this thread.
Numbers: Numbers have to exist in this universe by some means for math to be able to do what math does in this universe.
Space, time, gravity: Okay, what are your views of those items?
Fabric of spacetime: Okay, what exactly is this fabric made up of so that it ‘exists’? You appear are the one making stuff up. And while we are at it, how exactly does gravity and matter warp the fabric of spacetime?
“I lean on the most current understanding of science.”
And hence, you haven’t thought critically beyond what science is telling you. You probably believe the singular big bang theory is really true too don’t you?
@Charles Brightman
Gravity test. I did do a keyword search in your expanded posts, if I had managed to find a reference to a gravity test I would not have asked you to be more specific.
You make the claim that numbers have to ‘exist’, but can you demonstrate that? I put it to you that you can’t.
And what do you mean by math ‘doing’ something? It is a language we use to explain phenomenon.
Fabric in this context is just a descriptor, referring to how space and time are ‘interwoven’, like in a fabric. This is common nomenclature, have you never opened a physics book?
So to answer, the ‘fabric’ is made up of space and time.
Asking why mass bends space time is a deep deep rabbit hole. Very, very briefly, matter, which had mass, exists. Mass is energy momentum and energy momentum curves spacetime. As to why energy momentum curves space time, assuming the equivalence principle, we know that if space time can be bent, it must be by energy momentum. To explain why it must be energy momentum and not some other charge I would have to paraphrase all of Einsteins work, but it boils down to his field equations. His field equations include the constant G. There is nothing theoretically stopping G from being zero, meaning nothing can warp spacetime, but observable evidence shows otherwise, so then we know it must be nonzero. Why is it nonzero? Several hypotheses exist, such as string theory, but we don’t quite know yet why G is nonzero.
The fact that you don’t lean on the most current understanding in science explains a lot. I can and do think many things beyond what science has thus far discovered, but I cannot draw any actual conclusions from whatever ideas I think sound nice. Actually pushing the boundaries takes years of education and a lot of very hard work, not random musings without a basic understanding of what we already know.
And to answer your final question, yes I accept that the current best evidence suggests that there was a ‘big bang’, given our current understanding of physics. Why don’t you accept it? Do you have an alternative?
@Boreasos Then you are an idiot, and I am done with you. Have a nice day.
And this is only the start. It will be quite the carnage of ICE car companies in the next decade. Also imagine all the new tech possible due to smaller more efficient battery sizes. Also for some reason that Charles guy in this comment section is running some Hydrogen scam/bot so be careful.
Check out my Twitter page under the same name as this comment, and decide for yourself who is lying and who isn’t.
1:52 “Musk promises stronger, cheaper fuel cell.”
Man, this channel is crap.
EV’s are terrible for the environment. We need Amsterdam not L.A not that anyone gives a shit.