George Yeo, visiting scholar at the National University of Singapore’s Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy and former Singapore foreign minister, says “we’ve got to get used to the idea that Trump may well come back.”
‘Not clear’ which U.S. presidential candidate China prefers: Former Singapore foreign minister
- Update Date：
- Post Date：
- Tags
☺️☺️☺️☺️
Obviously the more incompetent will win in 2024.
That doesn’t narrow things down at all.
@@ZweiZwolf 🤣🤣🤣😂😂😅😅
Don’t worry Asia if Trump wins he will be so busy taking revenge on his enemies in the US he will ignore the rest of the world.
Singaporean here. Just want to say that George Yeo is a highly respected and competent politician and I would take his views seriously everytime he speaks on record.
George Yeo can’t get re elected running under PAP. How is he qualified to comment on elections and electability of politicians in other countries? Maybe better to interview Chen Show Mao?
Lee Kuan yew is still the Legend 😂
It doesn’t matter, China just deal with it as usual
does it matter who wins?
Not really. It’s not like either of them represent the working person or are competent at foreign policy.
Whoever wins they answer to the same bosses
Of course. Say NO to Woke ideologies. Have a stand like Argentina President’s recent interview why he supported Trump’s policies in response to China’s Remimbi controlled band. At least he understood why and how to fix his own currency demise due to accumulated monetary and fiscal issues that were triggered by the mismatch between spendings and investments. Centra bankers tried to fix that but sometimes 20 years of attempts still didn’t solve the destruction.
@@ssuwandi3240 Same corporation creates two polarizing brands to offer consumers the illusion of choices. Deep down both parties bow down to Israel, corporate America and military industrial complex and ultimately, US hegemony.
Please Biden just continued trumps policies…
As for Argentina
👇
Argentina used Chinese yuan for part of its payment to the IMF as US dollars remain scarce
Filip De Mott Nov 2, 2023, 12:34 PM GMT-7
BI
I don’t think China cares, because both candidates have proven to be enemies of China. China will have to wait another 4+ years to see if there’s a less unfriendly choice later.
China don’t give a hoot who is the next POTUS.
If American truly want their beloved United States of America to be a great, benevolent and respectable nation, Americans need to do the following.
(1) Force the two parties, democrats and republicans, to put up two fresh and respectable candidates for the presidential elections.
(2) Demand an end to political lobbying by arms manufacturers; gun ownership societies and clubs, etc.
(3) Demand an end to having clowns; lunatics and fools entering politics. Currently, United States Congress has a high percentage of such politicians.
Americans deserve to have a much higher standard of the country’s government.
United States of America must avoid walking along a path that sinks the country into the abyss of insanity.
💯🎯🎯👏👏
😂👍👍👍
Might as well , Let the citizens vote on funding and entering Wars ⁉️
Especially for other country’s wars
Another instance when Americans can’t distinguish between a Singaporean and a Chinese national. Why ask a Singaporean who CHINA prefers as a US president? One would never ask an Aussie who Britain would prefer as US president. Another dumb (Uncle) Tom Cotton.
Come on, Asia countries are not interested in who the POTUS is as it’s irrelevant. Probably American & the West are apprehensive about it. Of course, America’s lapdog countries have got a very good reason to be apprehensive about it.😉
Both comes from the same mould, both are aging and incompetent. Both are fiercely anti-China, so really doesn’t makes any difference, both are equally bad.
China don’t care about Who Win the election in U.S. as far as Election is U.S. Domestic affairs 😂 . With no Involvement meddle in China internal and Sovereignty, economic , Social , cultural Civilization Affairs of Development Affairs nor Smear and Humiliation 😂 . China is not expecting anything or depending on U.S. in any way lol . So far China is no where threat to U.S. , nor displacement U.S. positions in Case U.S. think that is their mindset Problems rather than China😂lol . Nobody can meddle How Others mindset work 😂❓. That’s Ghostly diseases China is no America Doctors to cure😂.
China must be fully prepared to handle the most anti-China US President at all times as the well-being of China depends solely on itself and not on other’s good nature
Putin’s reply was … “At least Biden is predictable.”
Give the big guy 10% and yup completely predictable… whatever you desire Sir 😂
I don’t think even the Americans have the answer.
he nailed it… China doesnt care about hegemony like America does…
It make no difference to China which parties become the government in the US.
China responds in a mature way to whoever run the government in the US and carry on with its normal existence and taking care of its own economy for the betterment of its own people.
The US will do anything to sabotage China progress and to ensure that China cannot catch up or compete with the Us in advanced technology.
China is focus on its own internal growth and is doing this to make the life of average Chinese better than competing with the US.
China is perfectly fine to do business and trade with other countries including the US.
China is embarking on engineering and industrial transition from its agricultural industry to the efficient and stable manufacturing processes in scientific and technological development in the modern economy.
The US economy is focus on conflict and war as well as total submission on other countries to US interest and US foreign policy and making money for its military industrial complex and big corporations.
China structural transformation in economic development contrast sharply with the US military and diplomatic tensions to undermines other countries to stoke up trouble to force total compliance and submission to US interests and US foreign policy.
The US bad mouths China and trying to undermine China with falsehood and propaganda war in order to demonized China.
US is US and China do not need to abase itself like the US.
China’s biggest trade in Asia is Meth and Coccaine.
China does not give a shit about who will be the next US president because both candidates are shit.
this Singaporean is a PRC stooge in case anybody isn’t clear. He left SG politics and now kisses PRC feet
Both Trump and Biden are clowns but I prefer Trump. He is more entertaining. BTW, I am Chinese.
Your comment is an insult of the Chinese ethnicity.
Many Chinese people like Trump, including myself.
Both are useless. US is history anyway. Who cares 😂
The USA knows consciously (or subconsciously) it is in decline. In a few decades from now, not just China would overtake USA economically, but also India, even Indonesia according to economists. USA then has to contend itself to being no.3 or no 4 economically. Hopefully by then, its hawkish, warmongering and hegemonic cravings would fade somewhat, including its 800+ military bases around the world.
Seriously, most Americans by now must have come to realize, PRChina would prefer that U.S.A. has no President at all …..
China prefer the candidate that Americans want who is neither.
Any newly elected president of usa it will still remained unchange towards China
Why should China care about a broken decaying country and gov that does nothing positive for humanity?
USA evil War Games around the world
“The United States has carried out 34 percent of its 392 interventions against countries in Latin America and the Caribbean; 23 percent in East Asia and the Pacific region; 14 percent in the Middle East and North Africa; and just 13 percent in Europe and Central Asia, according to a newly refined version of the Military Intervention Project (MIP) dataset — a venture of the Center for Strategic Studies at Tufts University’s Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.”
From David Vine’s The United States at War:
1941-1945 World War II (Europe, North Africa, Asia/Pacific)
1946 Trieste
1947-1949 Greece
1948-1949 Berlin, Germany
1950 Formosa (Taiwan)
1950-1953 Korea
1953-1954 Formosa (Taiwan)
1955-1975 Vietnam
1956 Egypt
1958 Lebanon
1962 Cuba
1962 Thailand
1962-1975 Laos
1964 Congo (Zaire)
1965 Dominican Republic
1965-1973 Cambodia
1967 Congo (Zaire)
1976 Korea
1978 Congo (Zaire)
1980 Iran
1981 El Salvador
1981 Libya
1981-1989 Nicaragua
1982-1983 Egypt
1982-1983 Lebanon
1983 Chad
1983 Grenada
1986 Bolivia
1986 Libya
1987-1988 Iran
1988 Panama
1989 Bolivia
1989 Colombia
1989 Libya
1989 Peru
1989 Philippines
1989-1990 Panama
1990 Saudi Arabia
1991 Congo (Zaire)
1991-1992 Kuwait
1991-1993 Iraq
1992-1994 Somalia
1993-1994 Macedonia
1993-1996 Haiti
1993-2005 Bosnia
1995 Serbia
1996 Liberia
1996 Rwanda
1997-2003 Iraq
1998 Afghanistan
1998 Sudan
1999-2000 Kosovo
1999-2000 Montenegro
1999-2000 Serbia
2000 Yemen
2000-2002 East Timor
2000-2016 Colombia
2001 – Afghanistan
2001- Pakistan
2001- Somalia
2002-2015 Philippines
2002- Yemen
2003-2011 Iraq
2004 Haiti
c2004- Kenya
2011 Democratic Republic of the Congo
2011-2017 Uganda
2011- Libya
c2012- Central African Republic
c2012- Mali
c2013-2016 South Sudan
c2013- Burkina Faso
c2013- Chad
c2013- Mauritania
c2013- Niger
c2013- Nigeria
2014 Democratic Republic of the Congo
2014- Iraq
2014- Syria
2015 Democratic Republic of the Congo
c2015- Cameroon
2016 Democratic Republic of the Congo
2017- Saudi Arabia
c2017 Tunisia
2019- Philippines
The supreme international crime according to 2017 U.S. media reporting is interfering nonviolently in a democratic election — at least if Russia does it. William Blum, in his book Rogue State, lists over 30 times that the United States has done that. Another study, however, says 81 elections in 47 countries. France 2017 makes that total at least 82. Honduras 2017 makes it 83. Russia 2018 makes it 84. The 2020-revealed 1964 coup in British Guiana makes it 85. Somalia 2022 would be 86. There are clearly dozens more.
In a reality-based assessment of U.S. crimes, the serious offenses begin beyond that threshold. Here’s Blum’s list of over 50 foreign leaders whom the United States has attempted to assassinate:
1949 – Kim Koo, Korean opposition leader
1950s – CIA/Neo-Nazi hit list of more than 200 political figures in West Germany to be “put out of the way” in the event of a Soviet invasion
1950s – Chou En-lai, Prime minister of China, several attempts on his life
1950s, 1962 – Sukarno, President of Indonesia
1951 – Kim Il Sung, Premier of North Korea
1953 – Mohammed Mossadegh, Prime Minister of Iran
1950s (mid) – Claro M. Recto, Philippines opposition leader
1955 – Jawaharlal Nehru, Prime Minister of India
1957 – Gamal Abdul Nasser, President of Egypt
1959, 1963, 1969 – Norodom Sihanouk, leader of Cambodia
1960 – Brig. Gen. Abdul Karim Kassem, leader of Iraq
1950s-70s – José Figueres, President of Costa Rica, two attempts on his life
1961 – Francois “Papa Doc” Duvalier, leader of Haiti
1961 – Patrice Lumumba, Prime Minister of the Congo (Zaire)
1961 – Gen. Rafael Trujillo, leader of Dominican Republic
1963 – Ngo Dinh Diem, President of South Vietnam
1960s-70s – Fidel Castro, President of Cuba, many attempts on his life
1960s – Raúl Castro, high official in government of Cuba
1965 – Francisco Caamaño, Dominican Republic opposition leader
1965-6 – Charles de Gaulle, President of France
1967 – Che Guevara, Cuban leader
1970 – Salvador Allende, President of Chile
1970 – Gen. Rene Schneider, Commander-in-Chief of Army, Chile
1970s, 1981 – General Omar Torrijos, leader of Panama
1972 – General Manuel Noriega, Chief of Panama Intelligence
1975 – Mobutu Sese Seko, President of Zaire
1976 – Michael Manley, Prime Minister of Jamaica
1980-1986 – Muammar Qaddafi, leader of Libya, several plots and attempts upon his life
1982 – Ayatollah Khomeini, leader of Iran
1983 – Gen. Ahmed Dlimi, Moroccan Army commander
1983 – Miguel d’Escoto, Foreign Minister of Nicaragua
1984 – The nine comandantes of the Sandinista National Directorate
1985 – Sheikh Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah, Lebanese Shiite leader (80 people killed in the attempt)
1991 – Saddam Hussein, leader of Iraq
1993 – Mohamed Farah Aideed, prominent clan leader of Somalia
1998, 2001-2 – Osama bin Laden, leading Islamic militant
1999 – Slobodan Milosevic, President of Yugoslavia
2002 – Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, Afghan Islamic leader and warlord
2003 – Saddam Hussein and his two sons
2011 – Muammar Qaddafi, leader of Libya
WOW how can you manage such a big List without getting censor ⁉️
I do this
French Fries
🍟🦵💪🇻🇳🇻🇳🇻🇳
🦅🦵💪🇻🇳🇻🇳🇻🇳
And I get censor on another channel
It does not make any difference because US is at the edge of the slope.
Lost the election, now George Yeo work for CCP .
Makes no different. Corrupted, racist and more importantly equally incompetent. So doesn’t matter
Make no difference. Corrupted, n equally incompetent. So doesn’t matter
😂 Trump is self centric 😂
More unpredictable, unless they always praise him and benefit him 😂
Both are Israel choice nothing different 😂
These journalists like to dramatize their questions to get dramatic answers. Even sunny days seem like rain clouds!
We dont need china prospects whos their pick for united states new president. Its our internal affairs. Go home and fix yourselves your economy and your own government.
My fearless forecast:
Biden wins.
JB is predictable , Trump All over again . And the Political agenda stay the same , maybe even worst to the rest of the world
If Trump comes back as the next POTUS from a jail near you, you need to engage a good fortune teller who has a proven record on reading her crustal ball correctly. As for the alternative, you need to check the “death notices” in your local news papers regularly to see if it is Kamala Harris running the show.
With the greatest respect to Americans, I have to say this… Out of 340 Millions of you, you can’t even manage to get two persons more suitable for the job?
Another Karen trying to teach the world to sing
Surely Trump. Its more peaceful. Democartic Presidents start or continue wars. Truman the Korean war; Kennedy the Vietnam war; even the Afghanistan war supposed to be started by Al Gore as he had won. Obama continuing both wars.
Pepsi.. Or Cola. 👌
Seriously if those 2 octogenarian are the best US got, get your money out of the UsD slowly but steadily.
China can implement long term plans that yield long term and SUSTAINABLE benefits for their country. US, given the 2 term limit (with the 2nd term reliant on results of 1st term), incentives their president to pursue extremely short term and UNSUSTAINABLE benefits. Call Xi a dictator if you want, I won’t argue against that, but it does allow him to think long term.
Trump will negotiate with China so look better to me. I prefer trump.