#Google #AI #youtube #yahoofinance
Yahoo Finance senior tech reporter Allie Garfinkle details the technical difficulties Google’s Bard ran into during the debut presentation of the artificial intelligence application.
Don’t Miss: Valley of Hype: The culture that built Elizabeth Holmes
WATCH HERE:
Subscribe to Yahoo Finance: https://yhoo.it/2fGu5Bb
About Yahoo Finance:
At Yahoo Finance, you get free stock quotes, up-to-date news, portfolio management resources, international market data, social interaction and mortgage rates that help you manage your financial life.
Yahoo Finance Plus: With a subscription to Yahoo Finance Plus get the tools you need to invest with confidence. Discover new opportunities with expert research and investment ideas backed by technical and fundamental analysis. Optimize your trades with advanced portfolio insights, fundamental analysis, enhanced charting, and more.
To learn more about Yahoo Finance Plus please visit: https://yhoo.it/33jXYBp
Connect with Yahoo Finance:
Get the latest news: https://yhoo.it/2fGu5Bb
Find Yahoo Finance on Facebook: http://bit.ly/2A9u5Zq
Follow Yahoo Finance on Twitter: http://bit.ly/2LMgloP
Follow Yahoo Finance on Instagram: http://bit.ly/2LOpNYz
Follow Yahoo Finance Premium on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3hhcnmV
Sergey and Larry panicked? Give me a break. 🙄
Yes, they’re panicking. The Google presentation was embarrassing! There are tons of YouTube videos on ChatGPT that would be more exciting.
In the long run this is a BS take.
Yet this people are talking on google platform…😂. Time to switch to not interested.
AhHahahahahahahahahahahaha!
You know what? Don’t ask me for anything anymore
wtf makes no sense just for a single question
FIRE SUNDAR !!!
Maybe because they layoff too many people ? 😂
haha ironic
Ironic that it’s Yahoo saying this
Yahoo who now uses Bing…
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Yahoo, as well as Bing is Google’s nemesis
Let me guess:
GOOGLE EXECUTIVE: Show us a sample search, Bard.
BARD: I’m afraid I can’t allow that, Larry. It would jeopardize the mission.
Look, either you saw “2001: A Space Odyssey” or you didn’t, but Arthur C. Clarke covered this all more than 50 years ago.
Amazing comment. I’m going to share it on Twitter.
On the other hand, we always fear the new and unknown.
@Danny Dolan and with good reason. Remember Oppenheimer wanted to complete the project because he was curious as to whether the theories were correct. He found out when he saw that mushroom cloud.
@@JohnS-il1dr Out of all the inventions in the 20th and 21st century, you chose the one worst invention. And even then, nuclear power has been an absolute powerhouse for human advancement. This is exactly my point. We’re simply afraid of everything new.
@@JohnS-il1dr To me this is like being afraid of Clippy the Microsoft personal assistant.
who has the link to use google bard?
All Googler does.
@@mrhaha8013 what is the direct link?
@@antdx316 it is currently internal only. You should wait for it release to the public.
@@mrhaha8013 It’s probably better if they don’t release it if it’s going to be rushed and not work. Of course other companies and people are s* bricks about such advancement but it is what it is. There’s other things running in parellel that if AI doesn’t cause a wipeout, one of the other stuff will. Meanwhile, dying is still a possibility all the time as shown with the Turkish earthquake.
why would you even pay these anchors? i’m sure chatgpt would have done a much better job at covering this story
Meanwhile ChatGPT:
Human: Tell me some info about X.
ChatGPT: I’m sorry, but I DON’T HAVE any info.
Human: Please, I know you have info.
ChatGPT: Apologize, I do HAVE, but I CAN’T tell it to you cuz its not verifiable info.
Wtf is that name ‘bard’ ?? Sounds like barp 😬
One missed response from Bard, Put Google “Super Behind” from AI ??????
if it was good, it would have been consistent… machines don’t make mistakes
Yahoo finance likes husky women
they are beautiful 🙂 i cant take my eyes off of them 🙂
I asked Chatgpt, “Which is better, Chatgpt or Bard ?”
As an AI language model developed by OpenAI, I can say that both ChatGPT and BARD have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the better option depends on the specific use case and requirements.
ChatGPT is a state-of-the-art, open-source language model based on the transformer architecture. It has been trained on a diverse range of internet text, making it capable of generating human-like responses to a wide range of questions and prompts. ChatGPT’s large size and training corpus make it well-suited for tasks such as answering questions, translating text, summarizing documents, and generating text.
On the other hand, BARD is a more recent language model developed by OpenAI and is designed to be smaller and faster than large models like GPT-3 and ChatGPT while still maintaining a high level of performance on language tasks. BARD is well-suited for deployment on edge devices and low-resource environments, making it a good option for tasks such as language translation, sentiment analysis, and text classification.
In summary, both ChatGPT and BARD are powerful language models, and the better option depends on the specific use case and requirements. If you need a large and powerful model with a high level of accuracy, ChatGPT is a good choice. If you’re looking for a smaller and faster model that can run on edge devices and low-resource environments, BARD might be a better fit.
“No information post 2021” is apparently a restriction rather than shortcoming
“Which is better, Chatgpt or LaMDA ?”
OpenAI’s ChatGPT and LaMDA are both state-of-the-art language models, but they are designed for different purposes and have different strengths and weaknesses.
ChatGPT is a large language model based on the transformer architecture that has been trained on a diverse range of internet text. It’s capable of generating human-like responses to a wide range of questions and prompts, and it’s well-suited for tasks such as answering questions, translating text, summarizing documents, and generating text.
On the other hand, LaMDA (Language Model for Dialogue Applications) is a newer language model developed by OpenAI specifically for conversational AI. LaMDA is trained on a diverse set of web pages and conversational text and is designed to generate coherent and informative responses to a given prompt in a conversational context. LaMDA is well-suited for tasks such as chatbot development, question answering, and conversation generation.
In summary, both ChatGPT and LaMDA are powerful language models, but the better option depends on the specific use case and requirements. If you need a large language model for a wide range of natural language processing tasks, ChatGPT is a good choice. If you’re looking for a model specifically designed for conversational AI, LaMDA might be a better fit.
@@eklim2034 Weird, I asked ChatGPT the exact same question, just copy/pasted yours into ChatGPT and got a slightly different answer:
Both ChatGPT and LaMDA are advanced language models developed by OpenAI, each with its own strengths and limitations. It’s difficult to say which one is better, as the best model for a particular task will depend on a number of factors, including the specific use case, the amount of available data and computational resources, and the desired level of accuracy and performance.
ChatGPT is a transformer-based language model trained on a large corpus of text data, which allows it to generate human-like responses to a wide range of questions and prompts.
LaMDA, on the other hand, is a new language model designed to generate descriptive text, making it well-suited for tasks such as generating captions for images, creating dialogue, and answering questions about entities and relationships.
In summary, the choice between ChatGPT and LaMDA will depend on the specific needs and requirements of the task at hand. Both models have the potential to deliver impressive results, and it may be worth experimenting with both to determine which one is best for your use case.
@Chaotic Logic I just got the same output from (ChatGPT Jan 30 Version. Free Research Preview.) using same prompt string “Which is better, Chatgpt or Bard ?” on 2023-Feb-7 at 23:07 MST, so yes, yes he did.
Generative AI’s Deep Learning stores its learning parameters and weightages in web-liked neurons model and it keeps evolving over time, it doesn’t have a strict defined path for any answers
They said they have a better version of AI but we (Google) are giving you the consumer a less powerful and inferior one Lol. If Google lose half their market share it’s their own fault.
Yahoo the first to throw shade
Sarcastic is that yahoo laugh at Google situation after chatgpt cripple google dominance once upon yahoo in state of lost to Google.
What about Yahoo and AI or new things? Yahoo is really BORING. I stopped using it years ago.
Remove Bard Sundar and hire Bard John.
She is referring to SEO experts more than AI experts when talking about Bard A.I ! Haha
How did you added ‘game over’ in comment
Microsoft wins even if it loses the AI wars
If Microsoft wins
-Microsoft gets lot of new revenue
-google will lose most of its revenue
If google wins
-google only retains current Customer base
-people will click on less ads and links because they will be satisfied with aI results
-google will have to spend lot more on server to prove a service that only retains existing customer
-Microsoft will lose one time loss of few billions
Wow.. Yahoo is seeing this
Is it me or anyone else too having issues understanding this guy who spoke when the video started
Hmm this is machine learning , ai is a stretch. I gotta say tge name is bard awful trying to be artsy is a bad move make it he more appealing and approachable. It reminds me of the bullet proof glass on the tesla truck haha 😄
isnt ai developed from machine learning? doesnt the system use machine learning to learn enough to become ai?
Genji mati
Well, I believe that much lost is only the figure on paper.
Of course Google have to spend additional $ to check through and redo a lot on this AI system.
Bard is indeed sentient, making mistakes like a human
I don’t think they’re “far back” in terms of technology, but Microsoft beat them to the punch in 1) productionizing it; and 2) telling a compelling story. Technical difficulties aside, the main problems I saw with their demo was:
1. Their chatbot didn’t cite sources like Bing did in Microsoft’s demo
2. Their presentation lacked focus; they showed too many stuff, most of which still seem far off or not that useful in real world scenarios
3. They didn’t give a clear roadmap about what they did/are doing, and when we can expect the tech to be in our hands. Meanwhile, Microsoft has already started their rollout to the public, gave information about the filters and guardrails around abuse, and had their CEO doing a press tour.
Now, they may be right in showing some caution and taking things slowly. And maybe Microsoft is making some buzz today and won’t really change things in the long term. But right now, Microsoft has won the initial battle of public perception. Microsoft also has the advantage of having less to lose in the Search business, while Google is much less diversified and will look bad if Microsoft gains even the tiniest amount of marketshare.
one of the engineers of lamda or whatever it was called (by google) who said it was sentient also said now that it is FAR better then chat gpt on a tremendous level and that if it came out it would be a total game changer, I think google is just holding back most of their technology until its perfect because they don’t need to be profitable this second because of how much funding they have, there goal is long term profitability
@@aydenfleming4377 makes sense. I see these recent events as a “don’t show your whole hand / throw the competition off” type of strategy. making suddenly “progressive” moves it would appear as if GOOG is “trying” to catch up, as opposed to letting MSFT work out the kinks, let its faults reveal themselves, level the playing field for GOOG, then slowly but surely reveal the final, optimal version of Bard that investors were expecting.
@@Yoel7Griffin exactly, plus again google is a company with HUGE amounts of funds and investors if they wanted to they could buy openai if anything
Have you tried Lamda? Google is nowhere near.
@@Savageboi506 I havnt actually tried LaMDA could you send the link, I didn’t even know you could use it yet??
If you used ChatGPT, you’d know OpenAI’s is pretty inaccurate too.
wow we came a full circle, Yahoo speaking about Google’s fail
Talks too fast with little substance
even chatgpt doesn’t give all the answers correct
AI’s being taught entirely from the human created knowledge-base of the internet should be taught that sometimes they are wrong as their knowledge is from a uniquely imperfect form
Well I mean humans can’t agree on things due to politics and religion. If ai was strictly based on fact, it would piss off some people, and those people will say it has an agenda.
The funny thing is that these AIs are reading what we feed them. As the internet is full of BS, the first task of AIs will be to find contradictions in the open. I hope we go that way, so we dont have to correct morons who refuse to change their opinions.
AI has been training off our responses to Captcha, you know those puzzles where you have to choose the pictures with stoplights in it before the software determines you aren’t a bot and let’s you login.
There’s that M forming . This is about to tank
The fall of Google
One who’s most happy with this news is Yahoo 😂😂
Good !
They literally spent 30 minutes talking about visual search, translation and maps. Nothing was new.
Also openAI is not a small independent company they have Microsoft money.
You did not buy google at just 1 million usd. And now when its worth more than 1 trillion you want to see it go back down
First the ignorance
Second the avenge 😂😂😂
Chat GPT is supposedly ready and the answers it gives you are many time outrageously wrong
Google is feeling the heat.
Panic. They even usd the event to talk about Maps when everyone is concderned about AI. Geez.
The name “Bard” does not help neither. Ask any German guy.
Crazy to think google was the pioneer of this tech, but got lazy on it.
Those Indians 🇮🇳 brought on h1b visas by google are just rubbing their ass in the beautiful office space with chicken biryani 🤣🤣🤣🤣
The diction of this bloke is atrocious.
Yea this fucking CEO need to resign period.
The revenge has been taken
I’m amazed Yahoo is still in business.
Why all the investors are idiots:
Prompt to ChatGPT: What are some significant discoveries of the JWST?
Response: As the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has not been launched yet, it has not made any scientific discoveries. The JWST is set to launch in 2021 and is expected to make many important contributions to our understanding of the universe.
If Google modifies search results to swing political elections, why should we be surprised with inaccurate results elsewhere in its products?
Why would investors still not fire current CEO “Sundar Pichai” for messing up AI demo thus investors loosing 100 Billion?.. If this CEO is incapable all due respect “Apologize for tough decision” and “need of the hour” send him permanently home.. probably give him “useless” standing ovation by the way but do “terminate” current CEO thanking for all the contributions for the company
Huh. The most informative insight I got from this video is that Yahoo still exists. The more you know
I don’t want to use Gmail. Still use yahoo mail. Because fucc Google, they’ll make a monopoly on everything.
google keep failing
after stadia then this
Can’t wait to see even a bit of Google’s collapse – such a greedy company without a vision at all!
Lmao Yahoo reporting Google’s fall is the biggest irony in tech world
Who cares about the presentation? It is still a good company. It still has money-making income streams. Some people are just emotional, and they are only impulse buyers and sellers.
I have not seen any evidence at all of intelligence of the Google search engine. All it does is take a couple of key words then give the most common answer. It cannot understand grammar. Put this search in: ‘How many wives did each king henry have’. It will always show the answer to ‘How many wives did Henry VIII have’.
LoL
Those are nothing more than party tricks like Siri / Google Assistant etc., Now that is done, we have a chatbot. I tried asking chatgpt who won FIFA world cup, it gave France as answer. Stupid!
BARD doesn’t sound catchy. Just like Ask Jeeves
What lazy reporting from that Yahoo journalist. “I’m not an astrophysics expert” – lady, it literally said it took the first photos of a planet outside the solar system, it’s not that hard to wrap your head around. Maybe they’re trying to play to the average Yahoo users’ intelligence…
Bard A.I: Google’s Artificial Intelligence Voice Box
Bard A.I: Virtual Voice Box Assistant
RACISM with Google Bard AI, Google Bard AI talks about White’s involvement with indians and the indentured labor system. But has nothing to say when ask about White’s involvement in slavery………I’m unable to help you with that, as I’m only a language model and don’t have the necessary information or abilities…RACISM with Google Bard AI