The tech industry is still reeling from the days of turmoil at OpenAI.
Appian Founder and CEO Matt Calkins (APPN) says that what happened at OpenAI seems to be a “governance failure. Calkins explains that he understands how it can happen, saying “in our industry, the software industry, we’ve got a lot of talented, essential, and sometimes unpolished people and the board’s job is to educate, not necessarily to discipline, but to try to smooth the edges without killing the golden goose.”
Calkins doesn’t think that issues at OpenAI are resolved, but that these changes represent “a chance to reset.”
For more expert insight and the latest market action, click here to watch this full episode of Yahoo Finance Live.
Subscribe to Yahoo Finance: https://yhoo.it/2fGu5Bb
About Yahoo Finance:
At Yahoo Finance, you get free stock quotes, up-to-date news, portfolio management resources, international market data, social interaction and mortgage rates that help you manage your financial life.
Yahoo Finance Plus: With a subscription to Yahoo Finance Plus get the tools you need to invest with confidence. Discover new opportunities with expert research and investment ideas backed by technical and fundamental analysis. Optimize your trades with advanced portfolio insights, fundamental analysis, enhanced charting, and more.
To learn more about Yahoo Finance Plus please visit: https://yhoo.it/33jXYBp
Connect with Yahoo Finance:
Get the latest news: https://yhoo.it/2fGu5Bb
Find Yahoo Finance on Facebook: http://bit.ly/2A9u5Zq
Follow Yahoo Finance on Twitter: http://bit.ly/2LMgloP
Follow Yahoo Finance on Instagram: http://bit.ly/2LOpNYz
Follow Yahoo Finance Premium on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3hhcnmV
Has anyone else noticed how Monopolized and Controlled A.I. is being rolled out? The public is being shut out to just corny chat bots. Disturbing…👀🤨🧐
Although to deleted my previous comments but I do have to say they only wanted more regulation because they aren’t good.
Specific A.I is something should of been done 5 years ago, and started 5 years ago, these are not some hard stuff per say, just routing of computers into a cloud centre, write out protocols and codes for software connectivity.
making chips on the other hand needs 100 billion in incentives, unnecessary and outdated, it’s not even 2nm
Generative ai by nature are supposed to handle more complicated situations, and by having data feed being limited to several role, data itself and how it was feed was either by users which are everybody or some data engineers, essentially “company man or woman”
Which by nature loses creative aspect for how contents are created.
There’s the”I have stuff manufactured on our end” vs “I have this platform for millions of users to create stuff”
If generative ai product and services were a platform not a standalone products then the issue might be more tricky than how most people sees it casually.
Saying:”more regulation more regulation.” Is basically trying to echo something rather ancient in frame work, legal frame work, some of the legal frame work still haven’t figure out social media how the heck are they supposed to do generative a.i regulations. If someone has ability to fire people politicians should be fired first.
Was it a product or was it a platform? A platform meaning it will need its own community regulation and responsibility lies upon itself because western rule of law society have traditions of property ownership, a platform can be seen as virtual property where they have their own rule, if they don’t like something they can enforce trespassing kick someone out, that’s the traditional way of handling things. Or maybe they can do these regulations getting government involved into someone’s property, if platform sorted out data belonging and ownership some of these issues wouldn’t be an issue.
.” Grow up, make something, take hit if mistakes are being made”open ai have Microsoft funding to pay for mistakes sometimes even if there’s regulation mistakes will still being made, all these regulations for road safety people still drive like drunks.
Sometimes these 40 billion, 20 billion fines are not going to make up for the actual damage and it will occur even after a sounding regulation, if they truly want to make up for the damage it should be 4 trillion, no one can pay for that and it undermines the development of technology, using the terms that gets politicians going:”undermine the competitive nature of American innovation and job creation, alongside with its competitiveness on global stage” easy lobby words
In terms of cyberspace community development these big techs do way better than some standalone product companies.
You regulate them to a certain extent they’ll still find ways to scrape revenues, remember the whole Amazon algo thing? They still need to make revenue, and it’s efficient isn’t exactly on the right direction when no other pathways are being presented.
“I guess I can only sell stuff online, so let’s do the algo and scrape more revenues”
Nah man, give them some pathways so they can do some other stuff that’s more productive and actually brings more to the table for consumers.
You save 50cents here 50cent there, that’s 1 dollar, with 1 dollar you go to dollar store and buy something else.
The idea is to have more materials for people who needed it when a purchase is being made. It’s about finding efficiency in logistics and consumer economy.
But when you regulate them to certain things there’s only 2 side that wins in the end either consumer or the business, it’s the direct moment when money are being spend, because there’s no extensive path for business activity. in terms of revenue being made, business always wins, it’s a capitalism society after all, cut down on over inflated stuff so consumer can buy more stuff good for smaller vendors and new startups. More regulation couldn’t bring more startups
Regulations needs an upgrade but regulation body’s only are focused on certain thing much like Amazon structure, they don’t know how to branch out and see issues from other side.
4:00 diversification of your ai vendor don’t rely just on open ai
5:21 regulations to AI (at least at this time)for ai to be safe isn’t open source or closed source it is what data to train ai based on
7:20 have back of copywriter