The California DMV is suspending the use of driverless vehicles operated by Cruise, saying the vehicles aren’t safe for public operation. NBC News’ Miguel Almaguer has more details on the serious roadblock for the company, which is owned in part by GM.
» Subscribe to NBC News: http://nbcnews.to/SubscribeToNBC
» Watch more NBC video: http://bit.ly/MoreNBCNews
NBC News Digital is a collection of innovative and powerful news brands that deliver compelling, diverse and engaging news stories. NBC News Digital features NBCNews.com, MSNBC.com, TODAY.com, Nightly News, Meet the Press, Dateline, and the existing apps and digital extensions of these respective properties. We deliver the best in breaking news, live video coverage, original journalism and segments from your favorite NBC News Shows.
Connect with NBC News Online!
NBC News App: https://smart.link/5d0cd9df61b80
Breaking News Alerts: https://link.nbcnews.com/join/5cj/breaking-news-signup?cid=sm_npd_nn_yt_bn-clip_190621
Visit NBCNews.Com: http://nbcnews.to/ReadNBC
Find NBC News on Facebook: http://nbcnews.to/LikeNBC
Follow NBC News on Twitter: http://nbcnews.to/FollowNBC
Get more of NBC News delivered to your inbox: nbcnews.com/newsletters
#California #DriverlessCar #Cruise
long over due to shut this…. GM + AI = failure for sure…
PoS
Ha!
Put a streetcone on the hood. Hilarious
Change the name to Skynet Autos everything will work out fine.
Change the name to BLM self driving cars! It will work very well in California !
No… BLM ANTIFA terrorists have killed more people…and they also got away with murder.
jajajajajajajajajajajaajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajaja THE FUTURE.
Of course no need drivers it’s need human to be seated for safety requirements. 😂
This story lacks the key fact that the DMV suspended Cruise operations because a woman was hit and dragged 20 feet by a Cruise car in SF – and Cruise held back that information during a hearing on the case.
You can be pretty sure there was a lot “held back”. This is about people trying to put a product on the road. There WILL be the entire management group who will be pushing everything well-past limits …..because they not only don’t understand …….they don’t care because they are probably shielded from prosecutions.
One would have to demand to see ALL the testing done and by WHOM to get any idea how these vehicles could EVER be considered being “approved”.
Everyday drivers know how stupid things can get around them as they drive.
The fact that a woman was hit ……and the vehicle did in fact “stop” as this point, …….but it then continued to the side of the road dragging her along …….is a very clear indicator that “ALL THE VERY SMART ENGINEERS CANNOT GET SOMETHING A SIMPLE AS THIS ONE SITUATION …..RIGHT”.
If I lived in California, I would intentionally step in front of every one of these vehicles at every opportunity. WHY does society need a “driverless car” in the first place???? It sounds more like some “entrepreneur” someplace is try to make it rich and is paying off everyone around him/her to convince them to agree with the project …. and of course payoff whoever is “certifying” …but WHO needs it???
.
Why it’s better for people, don’t like crime, scary persons 😮never feel unsafe.
I wish there’s so much to choose for transport for safety it’s best this one, ca. We have it?
cars with human drivers are Much worse. Propaganda
Good. Then turn in your driver’s license and stop driving. The world is much safer with you off the road.
Good. Stop using our lives and cities as your testing ground!!
Humans do worse..worse…😢😢😢😢
Tesla has the only long term solution.
For perspective Tesla is collecting over 1 million miles of FSD data per day and that was reported on 6th of April so is a lot higher now. This data trains the FSD neural network on their pure vision approach. The same as our bilogical brain and eyes.
The next update for Tesla will be end-to-end neural network and it is the only solution to do this. Why is this so important? The beauty of well engineered neural networks is they can in theory solve an unlimited number of solutions. Manual programming can only solve for limited cases. No matter how much manual code you write for self driving, there will always edge cases that cant be accounted for. Teslas approach is the best solution now and long term, while simultaneously collecting the most data to train it on.
And not to mention, cruise attempting self driving taxi fares when the system is not yet proven is ridiculous. Tesla allows and encourages users to take over when the car makes mistakes. The data shows currently a person monitoring FSD driving and taking over when required is already safer then just a person alone. Soon FSD will be better then humans on its own.
😆🤣😆🤣😆🫵
Another FAIL 👎😆😆😆
One would have to demand to see ALL the testing done and by WHOM to get any idea how these vehicles could EVER be considered being “approved”.
Everyday drivers know how stupid things can get around them as they drive.
The fact that a woman was hit ……and the vehicle did in fact “stop” as this point, …….but it then continued to the side of the road dragging her along …….is a very clear indicator that “ALL THE VERY SMART ENGINEERS CANNOT GET SOMETHING A SIMPLE AS THIS ONE SITUATION …..RIGHT”.
If I lived in California, I would intentionally step in front of every one of these vehicles at every opportunity. WHY does society need a “driverless car” in the first place???? It sounds more like some “entrepreneur” someplace is try to make it rich and is paying off everyone around him/her to convince them to agree with the project …. and of course payoff whoever is “certifying” …but WHO needs it???
.
@gooderlinsen Why do you not want to look into the eyes of others which are driving around you?
Why are you out driving to begin with if you are not going to be aware of the actions of other drivers around you?
Why are you not willing to communicate with other drivers for the sake of your own safety as well as for the safety of others?
Austin: Each morning as I’m waiting on the bus around 6:00am the fleet passes me going west. There’s alway one Cruise vehicle driving on the left side of my two-way street. It seems to adjust it-self when meeting another car.
The guy who used to work for cruise voted on the board for unlimited expansion. This is a clear conflict of interest and unbridled corruption at the core.