Sam Altman will return as CEO of OpenAI after massive employee pushback on the board’s original decision to terminate Altman from his role last week. The whirlwind development only took a few days causing chaos in the board. Questions now arise about the future of OpenAI, its board, and what it can do moving forward with its tech.
Nina Schick, Advisor and Speaker on generative AI, joins Yahoo Finance to give insights into the recent development with Altman and OpenAI and what steps the company can take to capitalize on the success of their AI technology.
“These capabilities are going to continue to increase, not least because the incredible amount of talent flowing into the space as well as the money and the fact that pretty much all of Big Tech have become AI-first companies,” Schick explains. “So I think that we will continue to see these capabilities being developed at an exponential rate as well as the adoption curve being higher than any kind of general technologies we’ve seen in the past.”
#youtube #OpenAI #yahoofinance
For more expert insight and the latest market action, click here to watch this full episode of Yahoo Finance Live.
Subscribe to Yahoo Finance: https://yhoo.it/2fGu5Bb
About Yahoo Finance:
Yahoo Finance provides free stock ticker data, up-to-date news, portfolio management resources, comprehensive market data, advanced tools, and more information to help you manage your financial life.
Connect with Yahoo Finance:
Check the latest news and data at finance.yahoo.com
Follow Yahoo Finance on social:
Connect with Yahoo Finance:
Get the latest news: https://yhoo.it/2fGu5Bb
Find Yahoo Finance on Facebook: http://bit.ly/2A9u5Zq
Follow Yahoo Finance on Twitter: http://bit.ly/2LMgloP
Follow Yahoo Finance on Instagram: http://bit.ly/2LOpNYz
Follow Yahoo Finance Premium on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3hhcnmV
It has to do with money. OpenAI valuation is north of $62B with Altman as CEO. When he left the valuation was assumed to be worth $0 because everyone was jumping ship. The employees have stock in openai, they want the money…simple…
everything has to do with money and also the adventure of exploring AI. It is an exciting development, rather working on something boring work. AI is not boring at all. it is like developing a car, or a gun, they all can be useful for humanity and also very dangerous on the hand of other wicked people.
It was predicted that AI would cost jobs and create others ..
It’s will take away a lot more then create. This is very different than going from horses to the automobile.
I dont think it will exactly, “create” jobs exactly. It an definitely create opportunities for creative people, or people who learn how to use it. And in other casee it will straight up take jobs, not create. Not that’s ne essarily a bad thing. It an certainly increase work efficiency. The question is whether that efficiency will actually translate to better quality of life for people, or just increase the demand for more work to be done for no pay increase.
The ongoing dialectic between EA and e/acc is a preliminary of the imminent societal schism that looms on the horizon. These concepts will be ideological foundation of future political parties
I’m sure Yahoo would be able to afford real experts like Geoff Hinton or Yann LeCun instead of some pretenders who can only peddle in rumors.
If this has lasted for months then other companies could have moved into this „space“. Fact is that they need to first step up their game to even catch up to OpenAi never mind replace or overtake them.
I’m in my 70’s. I guess I’m a boomer.
The report says there is a schism, but does not clarify who is on which side. I’m guessing that Altman is pro-commercial, but I shouldn’t have to guess.
What people don’t understand is that AGI stands for Artificial GENERAL Intelligence. This version is only meant for the land. There is a version called Artificial Admiral Intelligence that is used for the ocean.
Lmfao😂😂😂
Can you be sure that the person being interviewed is not AI generated? The hand movement as expression could be read in any book for speakers. The content is banal and supporting AI, just as AI might want you to think. The persona is a parody of the current look of speakers that are presumed authorities. Too pretty, too well spoken, and lacking in depth. Just as you may get from a LLM. AI is already in charge and skewing your viewpoints.
Nina AI model quite possible