On a test track west of Tokyo, Japan’s Superconducting Maglev train hits 603km/h an hour, breaking the world train speed record.
The test is part of an ambitious plan to build a $47bn high-speed line between Tokyo and Nagoya.
If completed as planned in 2027 the 280km between the two could be travelled in around 40 minutes.
Al Jazeera’s Tarek Bazley reports.
But the lack of friction thereof could cause the train to topple off the track easily isnt it?. I wonder how they fixed that
@jeahere I don’t know about this one, but the german train has this levitation system working inside a locked rail; that means the train can’t get off the track unless the rail brakes.
COOL
@jeahere It’s inside a U-shaped track so it can’t topple off anywhere.
@jeahere it’s suspended in a magnetic field; maglevs are designed that they cannot de-rail. If for some reason the magnetic field fails, they drop onto the track and run like a regular train. Furthermore, the rails are designed so that the train cannot ‘lift up off the track’ either.
jeahere it’s evident that you did skip your physics classes
ET3 has made this redundant.
Very good
500km crazy Japan that’s too fast even for superman
@residentgood The engineer of the Japanese bullet train wanting all to understand it thinks about safety to the first. Ride comfort is speed last next. The Japanese Shinkansen drops speed for extreme safety as of now.
Superman is fiction but this train is real 👍
you mean iron man right?
sorry i autocorrected. Ehm You mean Flash right?
Future goals of JAPAN rail … 700 km / h
oh yeah
*Almost as fast as their economic decline, impressive!*
Shanghai Noon Lol.
ironic…spoken by a bubble economy..
You need each other, and actually the 2 countries get along very well economically.
Do you know South Korea depends largely on Japan for their electronic products? Do a quick research.
Shanghai Noon Still, Japanese average income is much higher than that of china.
Fantastic !!!!!!!!!!
ALJAZEERA NEWS
JAPAN MAGLEV TRAIN BREAKS WORLD SPEED RECORD AGAIN.
I LOVE YOU HAL9000
@いない
Oh, Thank youuu !
Hi Aljazeera, thanks for the posting. The information of magnetic system is not correct.
The current levitation system utilizes a series of coils along both walls of the guideway and the car. Not vertical. And it makes a big difference on floating power (100mm vs 8-10mm in the other maglev).
I think your buddy hasn’t even seen this comment so apparently your just talking to yourself like sad
603 kilometers per hour (375 miles per hour)…..gatdammn
True 603KM/H 374MPH
what about hyper loop?
hyperloop ..seems cheaper and safer than maglev.. 🙂 I prefer hyperloop ..
You wish. Hyperloop won’t last long man.
Nugraha Animation hyper loop will be 10 times the cost of this.
Because of the cost of making a vacuum tube and making to not to burst
Amezing
!
if that gets derailed then gg
$47 billion for 280 kms of track ! = $1 billion for every 3.7 miles !
+Nikolay Borisov You are lucky in Russia, because you have a president who has become so rich over the past 15 years that he is no longer interested in money ! So, now he can concentrate on making Russia great again.
We, in the west, also need to pay our politicians well, so that we can reach your standard of government .
+JSavic I think room temperature superconductors will make this a lot cheaper.
It includes development cost.
Les Paramètres de vitesse ne sont absolument pas les mêmes qu’ en France .Les comparaisons ne sont pas viables .Mais bravo à Tokyo , tout de même .Les éléments ne sont pas les mêmes au Japon et en France .Mais Alstom , le made in France , ce faire acheté par des Américiains .Général Electrique ? Ou est passé le made in France ?? Qu’ avez vous fait de l’ une de nos plus fière Entreprise ALSTHOM ??
MDR les excuses. Le TGV francais s’est fait démonté et pui c’est tout.LoL
no noise.
+Sauveur Dominguez you forget to leave the train and one hour later you are in another country 🙁
@My Kryptonite
Too, ur right 🙂
🙂 🙂
No, they get noisy still. They’re still displacing air.
Considering it’s going 500Km/h it’s pretty quiet.
thats not 600..
@Patrick Halbeisen no
Advantage – you can have a eco friendly mode of transportation with high speed.$47 billion on one particular route
Disadvantage-Too much costly to built ,with $47 billion you can buy thousands of planes relatively low maintenance and cheaper. Also with planes you can fly on multiple location.
Buying or having every superb technology is not a good idea always.
+Arpit Mathur Yes , But think of the less waiting time , more accomodation , better views , less pollution , no stress on any reserve fuel , catalyst to other future technology. Intercontinental train travel but the most important is the electromagnetic tech which will propel future inventions of all sectors including the one of space travel (space elevator)
+Arpit Mathur You need to acknowledge several points on the Maglev Train System.
The shinkansen or bullet trains are modes of high-speed transportation that are used in-order to get to prefectures more faster. If you are going Tokyo from Osaka, it would cost you around $125 compared to a plane.
You don’t know how planes work do you? Plane Maintenance is a very hard task. Checking the fuselage, the power and oil lines, calibrating the flaps for adjustments on certain weather conditions, airport clearances, wheel, CAV calibration, radar calibration, etc And those are just normal maintenance checks. Don’t forget the HMVs and the MROs.
Since MagLevs tend to use Magnets, the only consumption you’re going to need are for lighting, air-conditioning and radio services.
Yes, with planes you can fly on multiple locations but never compare trains to planes. That’s like comparing a dinosaur to a cat. Planes are meant for INTERNATIONAL travels while trains are meant for Domestic or metro. Since the JRS are one of the major transportation services in Japan, more evolution in Railway transportation is going to pop-up whether you like it or not.
Also, planes are never cheap. Standard planes like the 747 are relatively hard to maintain.
Sources: We go to Japan and take the Shinkansen to get from Osaka to Tokyo.
+Tada Banri And you don’t know planes if you’ve never heard of a budget airline…
This thing can deliver containers from the harbor better than airplanes at once
this can go faster…
if it travels in a vacuum tunnel.. you see one of the biggest enemy of all vehicles is air resistance…
with the current speed of this train combined with no air resistance..well it could reach around 3000 kph..that is of course when its travelling in a vacuum….imagine the possibilities..
international travel would be really fast…faster than airplanes…
with this tech you could go from NYC to Tokyo in just 3 hours.. imagine that.. this tech is also eco friendly.. no emissions.
the downside is. the current maglev train and track is soo expensive..if you add the proposed vacuum tunnel how much more will it cost..
A Hit-ler can make it by forcing people.
With the vacum tunnel probably million if not billions
Earl Gerard Pagatpat do you have any idea on how far tokyo is to new york? Maybe tokyo to LA would be good but it will cost trillions.
Digging continent long tunnels probably isn’t feasible, nevermind making the tunnel a vacuum as well
@DartLuke Yeah, one problem with Hyperloop is the cost, if this maglev train is costly than HSR, so much for Hyperloop which requires special vacuum tubes while this maglev train is far more practical. Japan may able to convert this similar to Hyperloop in the far future. They are just perfecting the maglev train tech.
Also they have been developing this for decades. Hyperloop is still in infancy.
Beautiful train Cheap excuses to not build though.
ARES With a money based economy, these trains are *shockingly* expensive. Like, blowing a country’s entire combined wealth kinda expensive if you wanted a country wide network. You’d need a resource based economy for that.
is it electromagnetic train??
Kool right?
Ask einstein
no, electrodynamic.
What happens if for some reasons the magnets not working?
@Motohiro Sato Why not?
@Motohiro Sato Why? There is subtlety in language, my friend, that a dictionary definition does not convey.
@Motohiro Sato The meaning of a word is found in its common usage, not in the pages of dictionary, my friend.
@Motohiro Sato Not sure why you’re thanking me for anything.
Magnet doesn’t work? It’s impossible. This comes equipped with super conductor. Greetings from Tokyo, Japan
安倍首相とケネディ大使はもう乗ったんだね！
i like pizza too!!! 😮
I like osushi too!!!!!
予算も少なければ、社会的な注目度も低く、高価な無用の長物と思われていたリニアが、中国の高速鉄道は中国人が開発しました発言で、急に注目を浴びる様になりましたね。政府もようやく実用化を決断しましたし、相当中国に対して維持貼っていらっしゃる様で。
世界に高速鉄道の需要があり、ビジネスとして成立する面があることがわかったからだよ。台湾なんか、地震と安全性の実績が決め手で新幹線になったのがいい例。国内だけだったら、続かなかったと思うね。
Great speed but it cost way too much.
In most other places, yes, it would not be economical. But over there, connecting three megacities with 30, 10, and 20 million people with a total distance of 500 km, it will most likely be profitable.
USA: The Pentagon Spends $250 Million On War Every Day and Afghan war costing US $45 billion per year
Richard WILSON America alway sats it doesn’t have the money, but all the wasteful spending points to the contrary.
a million people per day uses the current shinkansen line
can you imagine if humans droped the monetary system and just lived for the betterment of mankind what this world could achieve instead of NOT building something just because its to expensive when it really means some SUIT in a big fancy office somewhere is just not making enough profit
Eric Schmidt Yes, but why keep it now? We wouldn’t have come this far without cold climates, either.
thecoolone82 I’ve spent many hours thinking and dreaming about it. One day, if we work together, or have a shared disaster or threat.
Eric Schmidt nonsense, science, creative thinking and technology ARE free… The only thing that makes them “expensive” is arbitrary, subjective monetary costs added to them..
incognito Karl Marx prophesied about that at the communist manifesto a moneyless utopian society ruled by the masses.
Yes, I will dedicate my life for the betterment of mankind by reducing the population.
super record！！
was wondering whether it would be cheaper to fly airplanes between these two cities instead of building and maintaining the maglev line? an airplane anyhow flies faster
Planes are faster, but only from airport to airport. From city center to city center, the current high-speed line between Tokyo, Nagoya and Osaka already rivals the plane. This will actually be quite a bit faster. Not to mention airplanes just don’t have the capacity of a train.
no22sill Aircraft and airports are horrible inconveniences if you could replace them with trains. No two hour early check in, horrible security theatre, or being stuck in horrible seats waiting for takeoff, landing, and taxiing. You can just walk onto and off the train, plus the comfort of walking about and such.
Train much safer, short waiting time, bigger capacity.
Also, we will able to find reck if something happened to train.
if the power cut out does this thing drop on the tracks because it’s electromagnetics
its floating on magnets
No. It does not there is a battery storage system which will cut in, in a nano-second and this would slow the train down to a comfortable stop and also inform the relevant people of the emergency situation. I hope that cleared that up Mathew.
I believe the battery storage system is used in the German EMS maglev system if power is cut off. The Japanese EDS maglev system uses super conductors which can remain in levitation even if the power is cut off.
Much too expensive! it is only 280km and cost $47bn!!!
You have to create tunnels through mountains.
It would cost 1 trillion dollars for almost 6000 km of line to be built. America went from a national debt of 10 trillions to 20 trillions in a bit less than 10 years. Trump, with his tax cuts, will put the federal deficit well over 1 trillion in the near future. America has the money.
what if theres an electric cut off ?
and the Chinese would steal it
Ravikumar Kalyanapu China has alreday the biggest high speed train network in the World,
Lol .This is the sample of how Chinese steal the technology. Everybody in the world excepting Chinese knows, Chincom maglev was made by Germany, not by your country.
Chinese maglev train was made by
Germany⁉︎
Chinese technology is loserish😂
Racist, but probably true.
Asian Guy japan’s maglev is different from germans… its way safer.
trains are the future. for japan especially. reduces need for domestic flights, if this was available it could be faster than plane travel in terms of convenience. This also uses electricity no need for jet fuel and greener solution.
Alex Shi and more safe, i prefer fast train over a plane
this the future of human travel
the German system, which is using same magnet poles to lift the train, is more efficient. It lets the train fall down and then lift it up in a very high frequency. So the magnetic field doenst need to be static.
German Maglev system is more efficient, but it lifts the train only 1cm. Japan’s Maglev system with magnetic super-conductivity is much more energy consuming because it lifts 10 cm to deal with earthquake or land sinking.
if “on and off” stops, the magnet poles attracts and will cause friction and might cause accident. I think Japan’s maglev is better and safer
and China will steal it with any method in less than ten years.
stupid, their track width traces are totally different.
India still figuring how to build toilet
Emile Chen You confuse learning with stealing.
At least, Japanese learned their culture by permission.
Do you know Kentoshi(遣唐使) and Kenzuishi(遣隋使)?
Once again, their cultures were mixed, what is it with all this stealing nonsense?!
@Award Queue lol.. no
Just putting it out there Superconductors aren’t MAGNETS!!!!! They are a ceramic material that has been cooled down to it’s critical temperature (ie it now has no resistance). When a magnet comes near it induces eddy currents due to magnetic field lines cutting through the Superconductor and this creates its own magnetic field which both repels and attracts the magnets above. All though when you have zero resistance you can’t get a current to run through it (vie equation I=V/R), but sadly we don’t know then why it creates a magnetic field so atm we just ‘accept’ it until we find a reason why.
Otto Eduard Leopold, Prince of Bismarck, Duke of Lauenburg (1 April 1815 – 30 July 1898), known as Otto von Bismarck (German: [ˈɔtoː fɔn ˈbɪsmark] (About this sound listen)), was a conservative Prussian statesman who dominated German and European affairs from the 1860s until 1890. In the 1860s, he engineered a series of wars that unified the German states, deliberately excluding Austria, into a powerful German Empire under Prussian leadership. With that accomplished by 1871, he skillfully used balance of power diplomacy to maintain Germany’s position in a Europe which, despite many disputes and war scares, remained at peace. For historian Eric Hobsbawm, it was Bismarck who “remained undisputed world champion at the game of multilateral diplomatic chess for almost twenty years after 1871, [and] devoted himself exclusively, and successfully, to maintaining peace between the powers.”[2]
In 1862, King Wilhelm I appointed Bismarck as Minister President of Prussia, a position he would hold until 1890 (except for a short break in 1873). He provoked three short, decisive wars against Denmark, Austria, and France, aligning the smaller German states behind Prussia in its defeat of France. In 1871, he formed the German Empire with himself as Chancellor, while retaining control of Prussia. His diplomacy of realpolitik and powerful rule at home gained him the nickname the “Iron Chancellor.” German unification and its rapid economic growth was the foundation to his foreign policy. He disliked colonialism but reluctantly built an overseas empire when it was demanded by both elite and mass opinion. Juggling a very complex interlocking series of conferences, negotiations and alliances, he used his diplomatic skills to maintain Germany’s position and used the balance of power to keep Europe at peace in the 1870s and 1880s.
A master of complex politics at home, Bismarck created the first welfare state in the modern world, with the goal of gaining working class support that might otherwise go to his Socialist enemies.[3] In the 1870s, he allied himself with the Liberals (who were low-tariff and anti-Catholic) and fought the Catholic Church in what was called the Kulturkampf (“culture struggle”). He lost that battle as the Catholics responded by forming a powerful Centre party and using universal male suffrage to gain a bloc of seats. Bismarck then reversed himself, ended the Kulturkampf, broke with the Liberals, imposed protective tariffs, and formed a political alliance with the Centre Party to fight the Socialists. A devout Lutheran, he was loyal to his king, who argued with Bismarck but in the end supported him against the advice of his wife and his heir. While the Reichstag, Germany’s parliament, was elected by universal male suffrage, it did not have much control of government policy. Bismarck distrusted democracy and ruled through a strong, well-trained bureaucracy with power in the hands of a traditional Junker elite that consisted of the landed nobility in eastern Prussia. Under Wilhelm I, Bismarck largely controlled domestic and foreign affairs, until he was removed by the young Kaiser Wilhelm II in 1890, at the age of seventy-five.
Bismarck—a Junker himself—was strong-willed, outspoken and sometimes judged overbearing, but he could also be polite, charming and witty. Occasionally he displayed a violent temper, and he kept his power by melodramatically threatening resignation time and again, which cowed Wilhelm I. He possessed not only a long-term national and international vision but also the short-term ability to juggle complex developments. As the leader of what historians call “revolutionary conservatism,”[4] Bismarck became a hero to German nationalists; they built many monuments honoring the founder of the new Reich. Many historians praise him as a visionary who was instrumental in uniting Germany and, once that had been accomplished, kept the peace in Europe through adroit diplomacy.
Roo1 second ago
Otto Eduard Leopold, Prince of Bismarck, Duke of Lauenburg (1 April 1815 – 30 July 1898), known as Otto von Bismarck (German: [ˈɔtoː fɔn ˈbɪsmark] (About this sound listen)), was a conservative Prussian statesman who dominated German and European affairs from the 1860s until 1890. In the 1860s, he engineered a series of wars that unified the German states, deliberately excluding Austria, into a powerful German Empire under Prussian leadership. With that accomplished by 1871, he skillfully used balance of power diplomacy to maintain Germany’s position in a Europe which, despite many disputes and war scares, remained at peace. For historian Eric Hobsbawm, it was Bismarck who “remained undisputed world champion at the game of multilateral diplomatic chess for almost twenty years after 1871, [and] devoted himself exclusively, and successfully, to maintaining peace between the powers.”[2]
In 1862, King Wilhelm I appointed Bismarck as Minister President of Prussia, a position he would hold until 1890 (except for a short break in 1873). He provoked three short, decisive wars against Denmark, Austria, and France, aligning the smaller German states behind Prussia in its defeat of France. In 1871, he formed the German Empire with himself as Chancellor, while retaining control of Prussia. His diplomacy of realpolitik and powerful rule at home gained him the nickname the “Iron Chancellor.” German unification and its rapid economic growth was the foundation to his foreign policy. He disliked colonialism but reluctantly built an overseas empire when it was demanded by both elite and mass opinion. Juggling a very complex interlocking series of conferences, negotiations and alliances, he used his diplomatic skills to maintain Germany’s position and used the balance of power to keep Europe at peace in the 1870s and 1880s.
A master of complex politics at home, Bismarck created the first welfare state in the modern world, with the goal of gaining working class support that might otherwise go to his Socialist enemies.[3] In the 1870s, he allied himself with the Liberals (who were low-tariff and anti-Catholic) and fought the Catholic Church in what was called the Kulturkampf (“culture struggle”). He lost that battle as the Catholics responded by forming a powerful Centre party and using universal male suffrage to gain a bloc of seats. Bismarck then reversed himself, ended the Kulturkampf, broke with the Liberals, imposed protective tariffs, and formed a political alliance with the Centre Party to fight the Socialists. A devout Lutheran, he was loyal to his king, who argued with Bismarck but in the end supported him against the advice of his wife and his heir. While the Reichstag, Germany’s parliament, was elected by universal male suffrage, it did not have much control of government policy. Bismarck distrusted democracy and ruled through a strong, well-trained bureaucracy with power in the hands of a traditional Junker elite that consisted of the landed nobility in eastern Prussia. Under Wilhelm I, Bismarck largely controlled domestic and foreign affairs, until he was removed by the young Kaiser Wilhelm II in 1890, at the age of seventy-five.
Bismarck—a Junker himself—was strong-willed, outspoken and sometimes judged overbearing, but he could also be polite, charming and witty. Occasionally he displayed a violent temper, and he kept his power by melodramatically threatening resignation time and again, which cowed Wilhelm I. He possessed not only a long-term national and international vision but also the short-term ability to juggle complex developments. As the leader of what historians call “revolutionary conservatism,”[4] Bismarck became a hero to German nationalists; they built many monuments honoring the founder of the new Reich. Many historians praise him as a visionary who was instrumental in uniting Germany and, once that had been accomplished, kept the peace in Europe through adroit diplomacy.
Roo1 second ago
Roo1 second ago
Otto Eduard Leopold, Prince of Bismarck, Duke of Lauenburg (1 April 1815 – 30 July 1898), known as Otto von Bismarck (German: [ˈɔtoː fɔn ˈbɪsmark] (About this sound listen)), was a conservative Prussian statesman who dominated German and European affairs from the 1860s until 1890. In the 1860s, he engineered a series of wars that unified the German states, deliberately excluding Austria, into a powerful German Empire under Prussian leadership. With that accomplished by 1871, he skillfully used balance of power diplomacy to maintain Germany’s position in a Europe which, despite many disputes and war scares, remained at peace. For historian Eric Hobsbawm, it was Bismarck who “remained undisputed world champion at the game of multilateral diplomatic chess for almost twenty years after 1871, [and] devoted himself exclusively, and successfully, to maintaining peace between the powers.”[2]
In 1862, King Wilhelm I appointed Bismarck as Minister President of Prussia, a position he would hold until 1890 (except for a short break in 1873). He provoked three short, decisive wars against Denmark, Austria, and France, aligning the smaller German states behind Prussia in its defeat of France. In 1871, he formed the German Empire with himself as Chancellor, while retaining control of Prussia. His diplomacy of realpolitik and powerful rule at home gained him the nickname the “Iron Chancellor.” German unification and its rapid economic growth was the foundation to his foreign policy. He disliked colonialism but reluctantly built an overseas empire when it was demanded by both elite and mass opinion. Juggling a very complex interlocking series of conferences, negotiations and alliances, he used his diplomatic skills to maintain Germany’s position and used the balance of power to keep Europe at peace in the 1870s and 1880s.
A master of complex politics at home, Bismarck created the first welfare state in the modern world, with the goal of gaining working class support that might otherwise go to his Socialist enemies.[3] In the 1870s, he allied himself with the Liberals (who were low-tariff and anti-Catholic) and fought the Catholic Church in what was called the Kulturkampf (“culture struggle”). He lost that battle as the Catholics responded by forming a powerful Centre party and using universal male suffrage to gain a bloc of seats. Bismarck then reversed himself, ended the Kulturkampf, broke with the Liberals, imposed protective tariffs, and formed a political alliance with the Centre Party to fight the Socialists. A devout Lutheran, he was loyal to his king, who argued with Bismarck but in the end supported him against the advice of his wife and his heir. While the Reichstag, Germany’s parliament, was elected by universal male suffrage, it did not have much control of government policy. Bismarck distrusted democracy and ruled through a strong, well-trained bureaucracy with power in the hands of a traditional Junker elite that consisted of the landed nobility in eastern Prussia. Under Wilhelm I, Bismarck largely controlled domestic and foreign affairs, until he was removed by the young Kaiser Wilhelm II in 1890, at the age of seventy-five.
Bismarck—a Junker himself—was strong-willed, outspoken and sometimes judged overbearing, but he could also be polite, charming and witty. Occasionally he displayed a violent temper, and he kept his power by melodramatically threatening resignation time and again, which cowed Wilhelm I. He possessed not only a long-term national and international vision but also the short-term ability to juggle complex developments. As the leader of what historians call “revolutionary conservatism,”[4] Bismarck became a hero to German nationalists; they built many monuments honoring the founder of the new Reich. Many historians praise him as a visionary who was instrumental in uniting Germany and, once that had been accomplished, kept the peace in Europe through adroit diplomacy.
Show less
And people say we need the hyperloop
Xanthi Cunningham hyperloop is just a image
Kinda funny, that Germany already built a maglev system in the last century.
Now its 608 浅倉慶子
Both float at 10cm kaisermuto from the track.
浅倉慶子 , so over 36 year, Japan research only increased 86 km/h, that is 2.38 km/ h per year. But still no maglev ever for commercial yet.
They’ve been testing these since the sixties, why the delay? Maybe health benefits from magnetic fields? Couldn’t have that could we?
Are you jesus?
China steals japan technology.
@Emile Chen And China destroyed them. It was born in China but could not spread and develop.
@Award Queue then don’t send students to Japan or USA to learn technology
@グジーザXYZA China also receives students all over the world.
But unfortunately for them, didn’t steal their safety tech…
@Award Queue This is a concept there is no stealing in it.
If someone invent warp drive in this day, can we say that he steal startrek tech?
kinda wish that japan took over australia in the war, we would have a decent goverment, amazing public transport system and amazing vending machines….. Anyone thats been on a shitbox train in australia knows what i mean.
The rail service in UK is an utter embarrassment in comparison
Don’t even compare it do. I’m In the UK the trains are so crowded and inconsistent and slow that it makes Japan look alien
@EuphoriaGaming HD which is ironic since train/railway were invented in britain😂
I guess the brits have already lost their innovative spirit
@Paster of Muppets yh the bits would probably invent something like get food to your table without standing
wait until 2027 to Nagoya and 2045 to Osaka
china is building up vacuum tunnel come with 4000kmp still on test on ground
Very high speed
Technology is too good.
Only reason why we don’t build a better world… Not enough money.
I’m done with humanity.
I’m afraid it’s got a long way to go to match the Whitehaven to Carlisle line!
Mind Blowing
発発新わ日本愛
See the world’s fastest trains👇 https://youtu.be/5HvaKSbnVCI
We could make such cars which uses magnets.
How does it stop immediately when huge earthquake ? . air brake or electric brake ? and how long dose it take from full speed to zero.
tamaji kent it will be underground, there is not earthquake in inderground
Fast and furious!!!
確かに最高速で巡航中に直下型地震が来たらどうなるんだろうという心配はある。
浮いてるからたぶん平気
そのために、中国のリニアは1cm浮いてるのに対して日本のは10cm浮くようになってる
JAPAN bullet train world BEST number 1.
hồchóminh no french
No, it’s the TGV because it’s a rail train and this record dates back to long time ago, whereas the Maglev isn’t, but it’s the TGV because it’s a rail train and this record dates back to long time ago.
I can’t imagine if France decides to create a train like the Maglev…
900+ km/h
x BAD SPORT x Consider that Japan is an earthquake-prone country and that the land is undulating.
Japan makes useless trains only for testing. Never useful. Its all show.
I know u are Korean;)
Korean=always thinking about how destroy Japan
リニアは基礎研究にはいいけれど
ビジネスとしては失敗作。
100年後21世紀最大の失敗作として
日本史に名が残るであろう。
世界史でも21世紀鉄道最大の失敗作としても名が残る。
リニア運行自体で大きく儲けようとは思っていないのでないか。
リニア導入の理由としては東海道・山陽新幹線が兵庫県南部地震の被害で長期間不通になった経験から「東海地震の予想被災地域を通過する東海道新幹線の代替路線が必要である」ことや「東海道新幹線自体の老朽化により長期運休を伴う改築工事の必要が生じる可能性がある」ことが挙げられた（Wikipedia）。
導入が決まってしまった背景には、駅が出来る沿線の誘致活動や、リニア線路・車体を建設する会社、おより電力会社の強い要望があったと考えられる。 リニアが経営として成り立つかどうかは実際にやってみないと分からない、という見方が多いのは事実。
新幹線の時も世界三大無駄とか言われてなかったっけ
What will happen to the guinea pigs inside the train when it crashes, you must have a ball of steel
It can get 1000kph but they need to ensure if the train tracks are stable to handle too much pressure. They ensure safety than speed
the guinea pig will …… to be continued
Aren’t planes faster
USA ambassador in Japan. USA hate trains. Very very few high speed railway lines.
In USA airlines and motorways flourish. Trains are mostly a thing of a past.
nahh, motorways and airspace pile up
Worst new agency Al Jazeera
U.S. Democrats, including newly elected Democratic representatives, now have the choice before them, of either crusading to drive President Trump out of office by any possible means — alienating voters and splitting their party in the process — or developing an economic development agenda and working with him on it.
Republicans, whom the President pulled through a difficult midterm election with success which was no fault of their own, must end their Churchill-imitation war fancies. They have to support him in trying to make the “deals” he wants with Russia and Korea for peace, China for economic growth, trade with Japan…
What kind of “deals” should be made? China has just given a stunning example. It has made an agreement to fund and help create a major development center for magnetic levitation trains, in the Philippines. In other words, China plans to transfer to a less developed country, a hub of combined R&D, training, and production of — not old textiles, not smart phone parts — the very front edge of ground transportation technology worldwide. Essentially they will be jointly developing this amazing new rail technology with the Philippines. If China provides credit for this, it matters not at all whether the Philippines pays it back; the “return” will be the upgrading of China’s high-speed rail industries to make the leap to maglev on a large scale. That’s the kind of “deal” that can both revive industry in industrial countries — like America — and build productive industry in developing countries.
President Franklin Roosevelt understood exactly this kind of “deal.” He introduced Lend-Lease in 1940, using the famous metaphor of lending your garden hose to your neighbor whose house has caught fire. FDR said: Forget about money; it doesn’t matter if Britain or Russia pay America back for new ships and planes under Lend-Lease; we are building up the American economy, the arsenal of democracy. And FDR’s great infrastructure projects like TVA and the Hoover and Bonneville Dams had already built up so much new electric power that the United States could be the arsenal of democracy and provide a high standard of living at the same time.
Speaking of Roosevelt, he continued the same “deals” after the War and after his death, by launching in 1944 the Bretton Woods monetary system — to facilitate credit for infrastructure projects in, and capital goods exports to, developing countries. A new Bretton Woods is the really great deal the United States could make, through summit meetings with Presidents Xi of China, Putin of Russia, Modi of India — perhaps Prime Minister Abe of Japan. Those powers can set up a new Bretton Woods and development bank to create the many trillions in credit actually required to fund great projects of high-technology economic infrastructure, including in the United States.
Schiller Institute President Helga Zepp-LaRouche, who has appealed directly to the leaders of the first four powers to initiate such a credit and development system, has called for a public mobilization for it now. The United States must take the lead; and the American President will either be free to deal with those powers, or tied up by “impeachers” instigated by British intelligence and their “liberal imperialist” cothinkers.
A new Bretton Woods is thus as crucial for peace as for productivity. As one observer remarked on Veterans Day, to honor the war dead, stop making so many of them. See to their grandchildren creating things they, themselves, could only imagine.
Good this help me for my homework
Sir please construct Japan shinzenshan maglev train and sc maglev train project construct in India
why such a poor country must hav a maglev train? bad infrastructure, low human intelligent, try to build a sanitation first
Sir please construct sc maglev train project in India. Sir only Japan only develop maglev train project in India. India always loves China
Maglevs have magnets thats why 😂
China and Japan shall work together closely :)))))))
Railway system like Maglev, Hyperloop etc are the future of transportation in the 21st century especially for Domestic purposess.
May if Nations are in a step up like EU such systems can connect a whole continent.
Now, the need is for developing Supersonic Passenger Aircraft to reduce the time to travel un between Countries and Continents.
In the 22nd Century the only time consuming travel should be Space travel when People travel from Earth to either Space Station, Moon or Mars.
I am looking forward to the Japanese Shinkansen disaster video.
It’s been operating for more than 50 years, not a single fatal disaster.
That’s Japan, and can be trusted Period!
イギリスさんは世界で一番早く近代化した、元世界のボスでしょう？
頑張んな！
Mallard: I CAN GO EVEN FASTER
MAGLEV: Are you sure about that?
Mallard: Yes
MAGLEV: “603KM/H”
Mallard: ……
Hard work+Dedication =Japan 🇯🇵👌👍
The Japanese safety record is second to none on the shinkansen and will also be on the maglev.
I think the French TGV is equally safe.
@Peter13 nope.. i don’t think so
@CH Kiranmai Well, when both are compared to the German ICE they are in a completely different league. Right? 🙂
Stealing technology is also an art!!
World first
Its too expensive.
Thts why I like Japan
Al Jazeera is the most reliable news in the world now a days… Thanks.
Japan is the second most earthquake-prone country in the world.
Imagine what happens when an earthquake occurs while traveling at 700 km.😱
They say it ’s safe , but there ’s no guarantee.
My crazy train is much better tho instead of going forwards it goes backwards
Now china is ready to steal this technology
イギリス人には好感が持てる。日立の列車を買ってくれたしね。対してアメリカ人の中にはテキサス新幹線やワシントンDCとNYを結ぶSCMAGLEVに対して、日本人から技術を取り入れたくないと言って計画に反対する人がいるらしい。だったらHyperloopでも完成させたらいい。SCMAGLEVはイギリスやヨーロッパに売り込んだほうがいいだろう。フランスなどSCMAGLEVの速度新記録のリニアを開発してくれるのではないか。新幹線に対するTGVのように。