Israel is bombing areas of south Gaza where Palestinians were told to seek shelter
Gaza health ministry: 2808 Palestinians killed and more than 10859 wounded in Israel attacks
Al Jazeera’s Safwat al kahlout from Gaza
Subscribe to our channel: http://bit.ly/AJSubscribe
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/AJEnglish
Find us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aljazeera
Check our website: http://www.aljazeera.com/
Check out our Instagram page: https://www.instagram.com/aljazeeraenglish/
Download AJE Mobile App: https://aje.io/AJEMobile
#aljazeeraenglish #BreakingNews #aljazeeralivenews #aljazeeraenglish #newsfeed #news #aljazera #latestnews #gaza #gazaunderattack #gazaevacuation
It’s sad to see so many haters in social media about Palestine people and about Islam…
If anyone would have thought how Palestine people are treated in their own land..As a human we would have not talked like the way haters do…
No Human Wants War!
Hamas not doing any good for palestine people, IDF is doing a favor
The western media tries to dehumanize Palestinians
If Palestinians want to be free, they need to leave Israel and never return.
From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free
Palestine will never be free unless they leave Israel.
Zoinist will leave they dont belong there!@Ricky Martin
The Ministry of Communications is preparing to close the offices of the Qatari television station “Al-Jazeera” and expel it from Israel, on the grounds that it cooperates with Hamas and serves as a mouthpiece for the murderous terrorist organization.
To present the stats so lopsided like that is either sloppy reporting or deliberate misinformation. At a minimum they could’ve clarified if these are just the only numbers they’re being given from each government. But at best clearly we deserve to know the full breakdown of soldiers/children/etc for _both_ sides, otherwise it feels like a weird bias. (To be clear, I think both sides are guilty of horrible crimes against civilians. Neither military is innocent. But it’d be great to know how much more/less guilty each one is to have a better sense of the truth of the situation.)
And if the answer is “well gosh it’s a war zone accurate data isn’t exactly instant” then just (responsibly) say that and don’t try to cite numbers killed.
wish more people knew the entire truth of this ages-long history of the religious conflict instead of what many of the modern day news media choses to report – may they finally find a peaceful resolution – prayers for everyone 🙏🏾
August 28, 2023 “… Last year, 2022, was the deadliest year for Palestinian children in the West Bank in 15 years, and 2023 is on track to meet or exceed 2022 levels. Israeli forces had killed at least 34 Palestinian children in the West Bank as of August 22.
“Israeli forces are gunning down Palestinian children living under occupation with increasing frequency,” said Bill Van Esveld, associate children’s rights director at Human Rights Watch. “Unless Israel’s allies, particularly the United States, pressure Israel to change course, more Palestinian children will be killed.” ~ Human Rights Watch report
Palasthine must protect their people by surrendering. not by using civilians as humen shield.
Palestine is not Hamas. Hamas is not surrendering because Hamas is radically anti-Israeli and opposed to the apartheid and genocide occurring at the hands of Israel. To Hamas, surrender is sacrificing everything. To Palestinians you can’t fight or surrender you just suffer the consequences of others actions
Don’t confuse Palestinians with the HAMAS.
Royal leaders of oil rich states will send their billion dollar Royal yachts carrying paper towels to the Palestinians as soon as MBS sinks this putt.
TV 9 in India is showing wrong news and does not show the 1967 drawing.
ghaza people are surrounded like imam Husain a.s. , unable ( injured people , patients , kids in intensive care & pregnant women can not move ) & even the others are not allowed to go ( all borders are sealed , artilay barage or misiles are ruining the safe roads provided by isreal due to news ) , water/food/medical and all sort of human needs are bannned , i ve not seen this after karbala in 1400 years. If hamas has killed innocent civilians and children ( which is strctly prohibited in islam ) and isreal considers it as a terrorist act then why isreal is doing the same to much more innocent population of ghaza ? states or or ture islamic fighters never behave or think like terrorists , they always behave in a legimate and proper way.. i condemn killing innocents of both sides , very very sad.. it has shaken my heart and mind.
God never supports injustice and keep in mind that one day all of we ll be held responsible for our deeds in front of him. stop killing innocents both of the groups…🙏
Genesis 12:3 Those who bless my people shall be blessed. Those who curse my people shall be cursed.
The children are dying because Hamas chose to base themselves amongst civilians. Stop supporting them and you see less assault from Israel. Simple math.
israel never stop attacking.. palestine is protecting their lands
Just get rid of the walls.. they don’t work and only serve politicians.
May Allah protect all Palestinians in Gaza from evil . Aamiinn
😂😂😂😂😂
Yes the EVIL of HARMAS masters that use them as human targets to protect the cowards
There’s A Problem… Gods People Are Not Supposed To Destroy Gods People. This Suggests Something Ludicrous Is Going On.
@David Allen Gods people?… Meaning?..Is it god chosen people or religious people?
My deepest condolences 🕯️😔
To the internacional community: Please, speak out against these atrocities! Do something!
Israel, Hamas, whoever is in charge: Please, allow humanitarian aid!
Egypt: Please, open the door!
💔
@lieslwindjulie3230. Egypt considers the Muslim Brotherhood to be a terrorist organization and Hamas is an off-shoot of the Brotherhood. Egypt doesn’t want Hamas fighters in their country and possibly cause internal trouble.
No.
Instead of giving the number of soldiers killed in while not give the number of children killed instead. We all know what Israel is doing is a crime against humanity, but stop being bias in your report of the situation.
Supporting Palestine and humanity. 🇵🇸
@Gregory Ulbright Israel belonged to the Hebrews for 6000 years. God has brought them back to their homeland and they will be there until prophecy is fulfilled! Just wait until Israel rebuilds the third Temple of Solomon right where the Dome of the Rock is situated! That will really stir up the hornets nest!
@Gregory Ulbright Clue, it was an UN mandate, fkn ignoramus.
Oxymoron statement
@Gregory Ulbright I think Iran is looking to be vaporized!
@Ricky MartinThe land was not given to the Jews by God in fact he says they must wander and not claim land they’re going against scripture and they’re going to get God’s Wrath they will be destroyed not by Hamas by almighty God
WAIT A MINUTE.. How the people in Gaza have soo much money for rockets and weapons? Why don’t they spend it on food, healthcare, education and infrastructure?
Remember ysa and Israel funded Hamasaki millions millions of dollars
@John Roberthson Tell me more, what’s your source?
@Oneshottwo Okay, so it basically proves my point
That’s Almost Pointless When Its Isreal Doing Most Of The Destruction.
Hamas is funded by Iran
Why doesn’t Egypt open its borders to refugees? Turkey got 5 million refugees from Syrië but Egypt gets no one.
This war has been started by Hamas and Israel should destroy Hamas. During this period Egypt can host civilians of Gaza.
Why don’t they do?
Because of a couple of reasons. For the same reason the USA wants to keep its border with Mexico secure; they don’t want an influx of civilians overwhelming their country, as well as not allowing Hamas to enter Egypt and turn Egypt into a war zone. Plus Egypt has a weird relationship with both Israel and Hamas because it is considered peaceful with both. If you are the higher ups in Egypt you are likely very afraid of making a decision because of not only the affects it will have on your country but also because of how it will affect your relations
@Oneshottwo US and Mexico border is not comparable with this situation.
There are 2 million civilians in the middle of the war and somehow they need support. If Egypt doesn’t want to get them into their country at least they can allow UN to establish refugee camps and by this way international aid can reach to those people. This will not turn Egypt into a war zone.
The main reason is just they don’t want.
Hamas want to use civilians as a protective shield. Everyone should see this fact.
Hamas militant not use civilians as shield, but they must responsible on their attacked Israel civilians. Because Israel troops will retaliation on its, so Hamas militant do not hide but stand front line and keep fighting on Israel Security Forces actions.
@Ninambir Sambom “Hamas militant not use civilians” ARE you serious?
No need to bomb tunnel gaza is near sea with heavy pump fill the tunnel with sea water because most of tunnel are inter link you need not to find out deep tunnels
Why is the key to ending the suffering in Gaza the stopping IDF actions
and NOT the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages?
because Al-Jazeera is pro-Palestinian
Some facts:
1. Regarding “elimination of gaza”, israel invested tens of bilions in defensive technologies such as shelters, Iron dome, walls, fances and more. HAMAS invested hundreds milions in offensive such as more rocets, tunels and other wepponary. Over the years.
2. Civilians displacment from their homes. 200 thousend israelis displaced from their homes (and no one talks about it) but only the palestinian displaced civilians are the poor ones.
3. Israel cept providing electricity, water and fule to gaza. 100 thousend palestinians was provided with jobs, moustly in the same viliges that hamas iliminated in this conflict.
4. Gaza population is being treated in israely hospitals aspecialy children (moustly onkological) for free including yhe family of ine of the top wanted terorists of the HAMAS.
5. Israel never set as goal, elimination of palestinians. HAMAS declared in intheir manifest as a top priority to eliminate all Jews in israel and “retriving” all the land from jordan river to the sea.
YOI CAN CHECK THIS BY GOOGLE SEARCH IF YOU DONT AFRAID FOR SOME OF YOUR MITHS GED BUSTES!
Israel is going win 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 for humanity
Devil
Remember next country may be yours.
@ReeanDevil? why?
do you know what a gambit is?
I think that the ongoing conflict between these two countries needs a peaceful and lasting solution, and world leaders should look into that, I wish everyone peace.
Does Hamas think as you? Do they want peace? Did they ever want?
@cankirsehirli I’m Worried About Why Innocent Lives Are Dying… The Leaders Don’t Have To Kill Innocent People.
Well there was a peace treaty in place and Donald Trump and his administration during his presidency decided to get rid of it and allow Israel to do as they wish. They stopped support for the Palestinians. Basically an unbalanced treaty was placed and now we have this war. It didn’t help that every president before that armed Israel to the max either. The people don’t want war, they never did. It’s terrible how governments can be
@David Allen Yes. This is the concern. Why innocent people are dying?
In this case the main question may also; why Egypt doesn’t open their border to refugees? By this way UN can establish a refugee camp to save those who are in the middle of the conflict.
That’s what Türkiye did during the Syrian civil war. At least 5 million refugees could escape from the war. If Türkiye didn’t open their borders 20% of them would die.
@cankirsehirli So What Makes Egypt Responsible For Gaza? Isreal And The UN Is The Ones That Decided Wafare…
Allah is missing in the rubbles
LetsGet Real Deliver the aide oeople are dying areu really that stupid Isralel do you have a heart at all ❤it been sitting therefor God know howlong No more escuses God is watching You and everyone You are assisting in theinnocent deaths by not delivering aid are you oroud of that Not happy Jan!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Open urhearts and help those innocent people ❤️🔥 from oz action is the magic word do it !!!!!
Shame shame arab league…
May the world be at peace.
Sorry
🤣🤣🤣 shoulve sent them to madagascar then, or better yet to space, otherwise – not happening
There Is No Real Peace Right Now, In Fact I’m Waiting For Armageddon.
@David Allen may not live long enough to see Armageddon. You may however live long enough to see the prequel to Armageddon described in Ezekiel 38. Russia and its allies (Iran, Iraq, Lebanon) will try to attack Israel and be destroyed by an earthquake or some supernatural event.
@Ricky Martin If I Don’t Die In My Sleep 1st Or Homeless Then I Will Probably Die From A Nuclear Explosion Caused By Armageddon. There Not Going To Stop…
Judgment from God to those who hurt his people.Glory to our God Yahweh and His only begotten son Jesus Christ he is the way the truth and the life who ever believes in him will have eternal life
Amen
The world have know and proof that this war are created by israel by using hamas as a ticket to destroy Palestine.If the world reacts they will love to start ww3 so they can safe thier economy from bankruptcy.Hopes all the powerfull nations like russia dan china take actions before its to late to act.
How many IDF soldiers did the Israeli government volunteer for the invasion of Afghanistan in October 2001? Zero. Not a single one. Even Iceland helped the US out more after 9/11 than Israel did. America doesn’t owe Israel anything. Couldn’t care less about this latest stupid conflict.
Free PlayStation
There cannot be 2800 people died in Palestine. There is way more than that. You report us are not speaking the truth about the destruction that the Israel government is doing to the palestine people.
Dear Palestinians don’t give up…Fight the evil occupiers Israel…And fight till your last breath…You have nothing to lose…
Free free Palestine 🇵🇸
Israel will NEVER lose a war. If the Palestinians want to be free, they need to leave Israel for good.
@Ricky Martin Israel will win the battle but they have lost the war as fundamentally they are wrong…they can’t hide their immoral occupation…
@Ricky Martin the U.S. refuses to recognize Palestine as its own sovereign state although the Palestinian lands encompassing the Gaza Strip and West Bank, including East Jerusalem has been declared illegally occupied by Israel since 1967, and yet the U.S. has continued to provide Israel with a total of $4-6 billion a year of U.S. taxpayers’ money in ‘aid’ –
The State of Palestine is a recognized sovereign state, similar to Kosovo and Taiwan, which is currently classified as a “non-member observer state” by the United Nations. As of April 2022, 138 of the United Nations’ 193 members (and one observer) have recognized Palestine as a sovereign state illegally occupied by Israel. The State of Israel needs to leave the State of Palestine –
De ce nu Israel war? Why gazza war ?
Military Israel and USA will win the battle but they have already lost the war morally…As you have the basic right of your freedom…Let your intention of freedom win…
They can take your life but can’t take your freedom….
The whole world is with you…
Free free Palestine 🇵🇸
If Palestine wants to be free, then they need to leave Israel once that border opens and never return.
Is there Hostages still?
골치아프네.ㅎ
하튼 재수없는 땅이야.
가해자가 피해자가 되고 피해자가 가해자가 되는 저주받은 땅임.
Bias reporting. No mention of the dead Israeli children. Not a surprise considering this is a Qatar funded news chanel.
이번에 중재가 되고 휴전이 된다해도 또 싸울거임.ㅎ
The West is ending with the fear of a little Hamas. And when the entire Muslim country becomes one, InshAllah, the Jewish Nasara will be destroyed.
The Palestinians only have themselves to blame they were given two chances to share the land with the Jews are they voted it down twice because they wanted it all for themselves
*West Bank & Golan still occupied by Israel. UK🇬🇧 responsible in Palestine conflict. Balfour declaration issued by UK(1917), which announced for establishment “national home for Jewish people” in Palestine. At that time, Palestine was teritory Ottoman Empire & jews in Palestine were still minority.*
Israel belonged to the Hebrews for thousands of years. Just wait until they rebuild the third Temple of Solomon where the Western Wall sits and encroaches on the Dome of the Rock. That will really get the hornets infuriated! lol
despite century of ethnic cleansing they still *are* a minority, just stolen almost all the land
STOP THE DAMAGING WAR,START THE DIPLOMATIC TALKS.
PEACE,NONVIOLENCE,TOLERANCE & JOY ONLY
JESUS IS THE PRINCE OF PEACE
WAR IS OUTDATED.BUT SOME STILL USE THIS PRIMITIVE WAR DUE TO IGNORANCE.MAHATHMA GANDHI,ABDUL GAFFAR,MOTHER TERESA, USED NONVIOLENCE AND WERE SUCCESSFUL.
THERE SHALL BE NO PEACE ON EARTH UNTIL THE PRINCE OF PEACE HIMSELF RETURNS IN ALL OF HIS GLORY.
FORGIVING IS THE ATTRIBUTE OF THE STRONGER & WEAKER CAN NEVER FORGIVE___Mahathma gandhi
WHOSOEVER BELIEVES IN ME SHALL NOT PERISH BUT HAVE EVERLASTING LIFE___ Jesus Christ
Propaganda thick
Free free Palestine
We are in solidarity with Palestinian, but HAMAS action is a big mistake because they attacked Israel civilians without warning, and it’s was unacceptable by many. And it’s was terrorist act.
Iran Russia must meddle, only they. Can solve..like Syria time.
Strange how Arab countries won’t take Gazan refugees during this war to protect them and take care of their humanitarian needs until this war is oven. Then rebuild Gaza and govern them without terrorism. Appears the Arabs can care less about them.
Why did they show the loss of life of both sides (which is fair) and than shows 299 were Israeli soldiers and 1000 (or so) were babies! Apples to oranges! If you want to show the loss of babies, show both sides losses! If you want to show soldiers/ militants, than share that! They love to say how biased western media is and yet this is exactly what they accuse them of (showing bias towards one side or the other)!
Egypt government cowards for not allowing innocent Palestinians to enter their country
Still waiting for photo/video evidence of the 40 decapitated Jewish babies by Hamas.
Why neighbours country don’t help why they need permission from Israel to go in. This is sad how neighbours can sleep while your neighbour is having problems. Ya allah forgive us
The cause nd foundation of the problem is Italy nd France Paris,America,Napolitano,Napoli,Taranto,Torino,Sardegna,Rome //!!!!!
See?! This Is Wrong!!! 😢
🇵🇸❤🇵🇸
1939-45 over 10,000 ppl were dying every day for over 6 years. Its sad, but we getting better.
Russia yuo take now ukrain control,isreal follow to you law,no need UN,Russia don’t belive UN, UN is one side gammer,same follow,china,isreal never mind on UN roole isreal ,Please china take Taiwan hong kong now war start better,now
I’m only 30 years old and am already tired of hearing about this conflict. Can’t imagine what it must be like for someone in their 60s. There is no side worth taking here. Neither side is guilt-free. It’s only a big power dispute over land
And the land is of Philastinians from 70th year of 1st century.
Quitmuslims
After reading these posts you’ll learn that there really is no unity of thought. Whether politics, war, peace, ideas…there is division… always. Thank you…. Class dismissed 🤣
God, this is so unfair, May you forgive us all. Children should in absolutely no case be involved in man’s utter crazyness and most disgusting greed.
Today is the proof that humanity has just failed as a whole. The sin of the children’s bloodbath belongs to all citizen on the planet who has the right to vote because we could have done better in choosing more peaceful leaders. Instead, we always fall for the same tricks and the price is the blood of the innocents.
This is just so terrible. I’m sorry, I don’t know what elese to say.
A citizen lost in his grief and terrible feeling of powerlessness.
The leading horse is white
The second horse is red
The third one is a black
The last one is green 🇵🇸
Its funny you are not condemning hamas for going into isreal and killing babies, killing whole families
Global leaders became plumbers just for water. War criminal Israel and talking of water.
Global leaders became useless. Nobody thinks on war crime.
Good for nothing.
Are there more points if it’s kids?
Thanks for the coverage!
Anthony Blinken denies humanitarian aid to any party involved, including Israeli hostages, it would not only constitute a violation of international law but also a breach of basic humanitarian principles. Denying aid to any group, regardless of their nationality or affiliation, goes against the fundamental tenets outlined in international treaties and conventions, such as the Geneva Conventions. These agreements mandate the protection of civilians and their right to receive medical care and humanitarian assistance, especially in conflict zones.
the International Criminal Court (ICC) would play a significant role in addressing the false accusations and the denial of humanitarian aid. If credible evidence surfaced, the ICC could launch an investigation into the matter, potentially leading to prosecutions for those involved in denying aid or attacking civilian structures. This investigation would serve to uphold international law, ensuring accountability and justice prevail in the face of such grave violations.
In the wake of an ICC investigation, the international community would closely monitor the proceedings. Global outcry and condemnation of these actions would likely intensify, prompting diplomatic pressure on the parties involved. The case would serve as a stark reminder of the importance of upholding humanitarian principles and international law, fostering discussions on strengthening mechanisms to prevent similar incidents in the future.
Simultaneously, the affected communities, bolstered by the awareness of the false accusations, would demand justice and reparations. International organizations, NGOs, and advocacy groups would rally to provide support, ensuring that the affected individuals and regions receive the necessary aid and resources to rebuild their lives.
The incident would also spark debates on refining existing legal frameworks. International bodies might reevaluate protocols and establish more robust mechanisms to prevent the misuse of propaganda and misinformation in conflicts. Heightened scrutiny of humanitarian aid delivery systems could lead to innovations, ensuring more efficient and accountable distribution processes, thereby mitigating the impact of such crises on vulnerable populations.
Furthermore, nations and organizations would intensify efforts to promote media literacy and critical thinking, aiming to empower the public to discern between accurate information and propaganda. Education would become a cornerstone in preventing the recurrence of such misinformation campaigns, fostering a global society that is more resilient to manipulation and false narratives.
Ultimately, this would serve as a catalyst for positive change, prompting a collective endeavor to safeguard the principles of truth, justice, and compassion in the face of adversity.
Anthony Blinken denies humanitarian aid to any party involved, including Israeli hostages, it would not only constitute a violation of international law but also a breach of basic humanitarian principles. Denying aid to any group, regardless of their nationality or affiliation, goes against the fundamental tenets outlined in international treaties and conventions, such as the Geneva Conventions. These agreements mandate the protection of civilians and their right to receive medical care and humanitarian assistance, especially in conflict zones.
Moreover, if Anthony Blinken were found to be involved in attacks on civilian structures, such as bombing a Palestinian hospital and school, he could potentially face severe legal implications:
International Criminal Court (ICC) Prosecution: Deliberate attacks on civilian structures are considered war crimes under international law. If there is credible evidence linking Blinken to these attacks, he could be prosecuted by the ICC. The ICC has the jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute individuals for the most serious crimes of international concern, including war crimes.
Universal Jurisdiction: Even if the crimes were not committed on the territory of a particular country, under the principle of universal jurisdiction, states can prosecute individuals for serious international crimes. If Blinken travels to a country that recognizes universal jurisdiction, he could be arrested and prosecuted there.
Individual Accountability: Blinken could be held personally accountable for his actions. International law emphasizes individual criminal responsibility for war crimes, ensuring that individuals, not just states, can be held accountable for their actions in conflict situations.
Sanctions and Diplomatic Consequences: Countries or individuals found guilty of war crimes may face international sanctions, impacting their diplomatic relations, trade agreements, and global standing. Such consequences serve as a deterrent against the commission of these crimes.
Reparations: In addition to legal consequences, Blinken might be required to contribute to reparations for the victims. This could involve financial compensation or other forms of assistance aimed at addressing the harm caused by the attacks.
if Anthony Blinken were implicated in denying humanitarian aid and attacking civilian structures, he would face rigorous legal scrutiny, potentially leading to prosecution, sanctions, and other forms of accountability. These measures underscore the international community’s commitment to upholding humanitarian principles and ensuring justice for victims of war crimes.
Deterrence: Such a high-profile case would serve as a powerful deterrent, sending a clear message to individuals and governments that violations of international law, especially concerning humanitarian aid and civilian protection, will not go unpunished. This deterrence factor could contribute to preventing similar incidents in future conflicts.
Restoring Trust: Holding accountable a prominent figure like Blinken would help restore trust in international justice mechanisms. It would demonstrate that these mechanisms are capable of addressing even the most egregious violations, reaffirming faith in the rule of law on the global stage.
Humanitarian Impact: Legal consequences for denying aid and attacking civilian structures would likely lead to a reassessment of humanitarian policies. International organizations and governments might reevaluate their strategies, ensuring that aid reaches those in need promptly and efficiently. This could result in improved humanitarian assistance frameworks globally.
Diplomatic Relations: The legal proceedings and potential sanctions could strain diplomatic relations between the country Blinken represents and other nations. Allies and partners might distance themselves from the accused, impacting bilateral relationships, trade agreements, and collaborative initiatives.
International Cooperation: The case could prompt renewed efforts toward international cooperation in addressing humanitarian crises. Countries might collaborate to strengthen humanitarian aid delivery mechanisms, share intelligence to prevent similar incidents, and work together to ensure the protection of civilians in conflict zones.
Media and Public Perception: The case could influence media narratives and public opinion. Increased awareness of international law and its enforcement might lead to more responsible reporting and public discourse regarding conflicts and humanitarian crises.
Policy Reforms: Governments and international organizations might enact policy reforms to prevent similar situations in the future. This could involve stricter regulations, enhanced oversight, and improved coordination between humanitarian agencies and political entities.
Empowering Victims: Legal accountability could empower victims and their communities, providing them with a sense of justice and closure. It could also set a precedent for victims of similar incidents to seek justice through legal channels, promoting a culture of accountability and justice.
the implications of legal action against Anthony Blinken would extend beyond individual accountability, shaping international relations, humanitarian policies, and global attitudes toward justice and accountability. This case would stand as a testament to the international community’s commitment to upholding humanitarian principles and ensuring that those who violate them are held responsible for their actions.
Has anyone else seen the thumbnail for this video here?
They show the number of dead in Gaza but obscure the number of dead in Israel!
It is simply unbelievable to what level these manipulative anti-Semites of the Al Jazeera propaganda channel have descended.
The use of genocide language by leaders in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, such as the language used by Prime Minister Netanyahu against Hamas and Palestine, is highly contentious and often leads to heated debates. It’s important to note that the term “genocide” refers to specific acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group. Its application in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a matter of legal interpretation and international opinion.
Regarding the ICC and other international parties, if there is credible evidence suggesting acts of genocide or other serious international crimes, these organizations can take several actions:
International Criminal Court (ICC) Investigation: The ICC has the authority to investigate and prosecute individuals for the crime of genocide. If there is evidence of genocide, the ICC can initiate an investigation, leading to potential prosecutions.
United Nations Security Council: The UN Security Council can refer situations involving genocide to the ICC for investigation. However, this process often involves complex political considerations and may face challenges in reaching a consensus among member states.
International Tribunals: Special international tribunals, similar to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), can be established to prosecute individuals accused of genocide.
Sanctions: The international community, through the UN Security Council or other regional organizations, can impose sanctions on individuals, entities, or countries involved in acts of genocide.
Diplomatic and Political Pressure: Countries and international organizations can exert diplomatic and political pressure on parties involved in the conflict to cease activities that may amount to genocide. This can include resolutions, condemnations, and calls for peaceful negotiations.
In terms of immediate actions that can be taken by the international public community:
Raising Awareness: Raising awareness about the situation and advocating for international intervention can garner public support and put pressure on governments to take action.
Supporting NGOs: Supporting non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that work on human rights and humanitarian issues in the region can provide vital assistance to affected communities and amplify their voices on the international stage.
Peacebuilding Initiatives: Supporting initiatives and organizations that promote dialogue, understanding, and reconciliation between Israeli and Palestinian communities can contribute to long-term peace efforts.
Engaging in Dialogue: Engaging in constructive dialogue with individuals from diverse perspectives can foster understanding and empathy, promoting a peaceful resolution to the conflict.
Advocacy and Political Engagement: Advocating for policies that promote peace, justice, and respect for human rights in the region can influence the decisions of governments and international organizations.
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the international response to allegations of genocide can have profound outcomes in the public sphere of consciousness, influencing perceptions of law and order as well as attitudes toward governments. Here are 10 potential outcomes and their impacts:
Increased Awareness and Solidarity: The conflict’s international scrutiny can lead to heightened awareness, fostering global solidarity with affected communities and encouraging advocacy for peace and justice.
Deepened Political Divides: Differing opinions on the conflict and the response to alleged genocide can deepen political divides within societies, leading to polarized debates and discussions.
Humanitarian Empathy: Witnessing the suffering in conflict zones can evoke humanitarian empathy, prompting individuals to support aid efforts and humanitarian initiatives in the region.
Trust in International Institutions: The effectiveness of international institutions, such as the ICC and the UN Security Council, in addressing the conflict can influence public trust in these organizations and their ability to uphold justice.
Impact on Minority Communities: Minority communities in various countries may feel the repercussions, especially if the conflict exacerbates tensions within multicultural societies, potentially leading to discrimination or prejudice.
Civil Society Activism: Allegations of genocide can galvanize civil society activism, leading to increased grassroots movements advocating for human rights, peace, and diplomatic solutions.
Impact on Law and Order Perceptions: Public perceptions of law and order may be influenced by how governments respond to the conflict. Perceived injustices or lack of action can erode public trust in law enforcement and legal systems.
Changes in Foreign Policies: Public sentiment regarding the conflict can influence the foreign policies of countries, shaping diplomatic relations and international alliances.
Global Security Concerns: Escalation of the conflict and international responses can raise concerns about global security, potentially leading to reevaluation of security measures and international cooperation.
Shift in Public Attitudes Toward Governments: The way governments respond to the conflict, whether through peaceful diplomacy or military actions, can significantly impact public attitudes toward their own governments. Trust in the ability of governments to handle international crises may rise or decline based on perceived effectiveness and ethical considerations.
In summary, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the global response to allegations of genocide have the potential to reshape public consciousness, influence perceptions of law and order, and impact how people view their governments and the international community’s ability to maintain peace and justice. These outcomes underline the complex interplay between geopolitics, public sentiment, and the pursuit of a just and peaceful world.
In the context of the United States imposing sanctions on another country for accepting refugees, this action raises ethical and legal questions. Sanctioning a nation for providing shelter to refugees implies punishing a country for fulfilling its humanitarian duties. Such a stance contradicts the spirit of international law, which encourages nations to offer assistance to those in need, especially in situations of armed conflict and persecution.
Additionally, imposing sanctions on a country for accepting refugees sets a concerning precedent. It undermines the principles of compassion, solidarity, and shared responsibility that underpin international refugee protection efforts. Refugees, by definition, are individuals forced to flee their home countries due to fear of persecution, conflict, or violence. Denying them sanctuary or penalizing countries that offer refuge can exacerbate their suffering and limit their chances of finding safety and rebuilding their lives.
Moreover, it challenges the very essence of refugee protection as outlined in the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol. These international agreements establish the rights and responsibilities of both refugees and the countries that provide asylum. Penalizing a nation for upholding these obligations weakens the global refugee protection system, potentially deterring countries from fulfilling their duty to assist those in desperate need.
In summary, denying evacuation to refugees and imposing sanctions on countries that provide refuge not only violate fundamental human rights but also erode the principles of compassion and solidarity that should guide international responses to humanitarian crises. Upholding the rights of refugees and ensuring that nations are not penalized for offering assistance are essential steps toward building a more just and compassionate world
Countries that possess the resources and capability to assist refugees but fail to do so are not only shirking their moral responsibilities but also disregarding international legal obligations. Here’s a deeper exploration of their obligations and the consequences of their inaction:
Moral Responsibility: Nations with the means to help refugees have a moral duty to alleviate human suffering. Failing to provide assistance contradicts the principles of empathy, compassion, and solidarity, which are fundamental to a just and humane society.
International Humanitarian Law: International humanitarian law, including the Geneva Conventions, mandates the protection of civilians during times of armed conflict. This includes providing shelter and aid to those fleeing persecution and violence. Nations not upholding these laws risk undermining the very fabric of global human rights principles.
Preventing Further Atrocities: Offering refuge to those escaping genocide or other forms of mass violence can prevent further atrocities. By providing a safe haven, countries contribute to breaking the cycle of violence, protecting lives, and potentially deterring aggressors.
Duty to Protect: Countries have a responsibility to protect people within their borders, especially those fleeing life-threatening situations. Denying refuge can lead to dire consequences, including loss of life, starvation, and lack of access to essential medical care.
Promoting Stability: Providing asylum can contribute to regional stability. By resolving crises and conflicts, assisting refugees, and promoting dialogue, countries can foster peace and stability in regions affected by violence and persecution.
Preserving Human Dignity: Upholding the dignity of every individual, regardless of their nationality or status, is a fundamental obligation. Denying refugees assistance not only disregards their dignity but also undermines the very essence of human rights principles.
Consequences of Inaction: Countries that fail to provide refuge risk damaging their international reputation and credibility. Their inaction may lead to criticism from the global community, affecting diplomatic relations, trade agreements, and participation in international initiatives.
Encouraging Responsibility Sharing: By taking the lead in assisting refugees, countries encourage other nations to fulfill their responsibilities. Demonstrating a commitment to refugee protection sets a positive example, fostering a culture of shared responsibility in the international community.
In summary, the obligations of countries to take in refugees are deeply rooted in moral imperatives, international humanitarian law, and principles of human rights. Failure to fulfill these obligations not only perpetuates human suffering but also undermines the foundation of a just and compassionate global society. Encouraging and pressuring nations to uphold their responsibilities is vital in ensuring the safety and well-being of those fleeing conflict and persecution.
Countries, especially those with significant resources and influence, have a moral and legal obligation to provide refuge to those fleeing persecution, violence, and conflict. These obligations are rooted in various international agreements, such as the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol, which outline the rights and responsibilities of both refugees and the states that offer them asylum.
**Moral Imperative: There is a fundamental moral imperative to help those in need. Countries with the means to assist have a responsibility to provide refuge to vulnerable individuals, irrespective of their nationality, race, or religion. This moral obligation underscores the essence of shared humanity and compassion.
Legal Obligations: International law, including the 1951 Refugee Convention, obliges states to protect refugees fleeing persecution. It defines who is a refugee and outlines the rights of refugees, including the right to seek asylum and be protected from refoulement (forced return to a country where they face persecution).
Preventing Genocide and Atrocity Crimes: Providing refuge to individuals fleeing genocide is particularly crucial. The international community, having witnessed the horrors of past genocides, has committed to the principle of “never again.” Offering asylum to those escaping genocide is a tangible way to fulfill this commitment and prevent further atrocities.
Preventing Statelessness: Accepting refugees helps prevent statelessness, a situation where individuals have no nationality and are denied basic rights and access to essential services. By offering asylum, countries contribute to preventing this dire humanitarian condition.
Preserving Human Dignity: Providing a safe haven preserves the dignity of refugees. It offers them a chance to rebuild their lives, access education, healthcare, and work opportunities, allowing them to contribute positively to their host communities.
Strengthening International Solidarity: Offering refuge promotes international solidarity and cooperation. It sets an example for other nations, encouraging them to fulfill their obligations and share the responsibility of providing assistance to those in need.
When countries fail to fulfill their obligations and prevent others from taking in refugees, it not only perpetuates the suffering of vulnerable populations but also undermines the global commitment to human rights and humanitarian values. International pressure, diplomatic efforts, and advocacy are crucial to encouraging these countries to uphold their responsibilities and contribute to the collective efforts to protect and assist refugees worldwide.
Anthony Blinken denies humanitarian aid to any party involved, including Hamas and Israeli hostages, it would not only constitute a violation of international law but also a breach of basic humanitarian principles. Denying aid to any group, regardless of their nationality or affiliation, goes against the fundamental tenets outlined in international treaties and conventions, such as the Geneva Conventions. These agreements mandate the protection of civilians and their right to receive medical care and humanitarian assistance, especially in conflict zones.
the International Criminal Court (ICC) would play a significant role in addressing the false accusations and the denial of humanitarian aid. If credible evidence surfaced, the ICC could launch an investigation into the matter, potentially leading to prosecutions for those involved in denying aid or attacking civilian structures. This investigation would serve to uphold international law, ensuring accountability and justice prevail in the face of such grave violations.
In the wake of an ICC investigation, the international community would closely monitor the proceedings. Global outcry and condemnation of these actions would likely intensify, prompting diplomatic pressure on the parties involved. The case would serve as a stark reminder of the importance of upholding humanitarian principles and international law, fostering discussions on strengthening mechanisms to prevent similar incidents in the future.
Simultaneously, the affected communities, bolstered by the awareness of the false accusations, would demand justice and reparations. International organizations, NGOs, and advocacy groups would rally to provide support, ensuring that the affected individuals and regions receive the necessary aid and resources to rebuild their lives.
The incident would also spark debates on refining existing legal frameworks. International bodies might reevaluate protocols and establish more robust mechanisms to prevent the misuse of propaganda and misinformation in conflicts. Heightened scrutiny of humanitarian aid delivery systems could lead to innovations, ensuring more efficient and accountable distribution processes, thereby mitigating the impact of such crises on vulnerable populations.
Furthermore, nations and organizations would intensify efforts to promote media literacy and critical thinking, aiming to empower the public to discern between accurate information and propaganda. Education would become a cornerstone in preventing the recurrence of such misinformation campaigns, fostering a global society that is more resilient to manipulation and false narratives.
Ultimately, this would serve as a catalyst for positive change, prompting a collective endeavor to safeguard the principles of truth, justice, and compassion in the face of adversity
Thanks aljazeera news without biaz , always seek the truth thepeople must spread rhe truth so that we will lnow the real criminal in this war. What are the personal interest behind the death of soldiers and civilian. The people must know the history who are the defenders and victom of invasion that resulted to genocidal war . Act now it could happen to us if we keep silent. The lord says seek ye rhe truth and rhe truth will set us free.
Wepray ds ends ,.
War shud end
Not correct
Innocent lives gone
Oh merciful god
Gave mercy on ur people
Protect all stop ds war Nd madness
❤❤❤❤❤ aljazo
Everything Netanyahu says is propaganda everything the idf says is propaganda I don’t believe a word of it because they are at war so they will spin war propaganda it’s the mentality of the war mind
Please Allah help them .innocent people 👫 Ameen Suma Ameen🇯🇴🌹🙏🇮🇳🙏🇯🇴🇯🇴🌹🇯🇴🇮🇳
Why is Wiki trying to give me unnecessary gyaan/ knowledge about who owns Al Jazeera??
Dear God protect the people children and animals of Palestine, bestow your mercy on them and keep them safe from harm 😢 ease their pain and suffering and grant the martyrs and innocents heaven and beautiful peace ameen! Help all of those who are in need and guide us through this and make us steadfast and strong in our prayers, protect our brothers and sisters 🤲🏻💖
We love you Palestine ❤❤❤ help is coming dear brothers and sisters we will stand together and pray for you and with Allahs help you will be FREE 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸
Palestinians are victims of Hamas, not Israel. Hamas uses Palestinians as a human shield in residential neighbourhoods to launch rockets at Israeli cities. Hamas and Iran are troublemakers not Israel
It must face international court of justice
Where are Israel’s hostages???
War war war ☸️ഹോസ്പിറ്റൽ ചർച്ച, ആക്രമണം മാറുമ്പോൾ ചർച്ചയുടെ ദിശയും മാറും ☸️
Don’t you have data or number of children killed in Israel …pls…inform us too…so that both sides will realize the cruelty of this war..✌️🙏🍀💐
Killed by their owned misfired rockets.
Any culture, that indoctrinates its children to hatred and homicide, is a danger to all of mankind.
Those who choose to take part in the killing of babies, children and entire families, should expect the same in return.
Think before you react: Not all “news” is “true”.
Soon when they conducted UN meetings, conclusion : there was no war crime found. 😂😂😂
Shame on UN, NATO, USA . and the Countries supporting Israel. And stopping humanitarian aid .
I condemn the act of USA and Israel.